CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
civ1
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2021:C100656
3 novembre 2021
Sur le rapport de Mme Guihal, conseiller, les observations de la SCP Fabiani, Luc-Thaler et Pinatel, avocat de la société Rasheed Bank, de la SCP Claire Leduc et Solange Vigand, avocat de la société Citibank
Page 40 sur 62
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1203DEC001506721
3 décembre 2024
Lors de ces échanges, le requérant exprima clairement son intention de demander l’asile et les agents se présentèrent comme des responsables pour l’enregistrement des demandes d’asile.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1220JUD005177208
20 décembre 2018
It follows that the claim must be rejected. C. Default interest 62.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1018JUD003408517
18 octobre 2022
In contrast, the police report of the events for the relevant day does not mention the applicant’s friend; there is no record concerning him.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0512JUD003874119
12 mai 2026
The applicant’s claim and the Government’s comments on it 2.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0119DEC002238293
19 janvier 1995
He was attacked in the early evening by a group of young boys and, when the police answered a telephone call he had been able to put through, he did not dare tell them that he had been attacked
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0701DEC003482697
1 juillet 1998
The court scheduled six days for the proceedings at which the kidnapping case was to be examined first, i.e. on 18 July, 19 July and in the morning of 22 July 1996.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0303JUD002106111
3 mars 2015
The authorities themselves pointed out that Institution No. 13 in Chişinău was severely overcrowded - on the day of the visit it held 931 persons with the official capacity being 600 (see also appendix
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1206DEC004705816
6 décembre 2016
It noted that the first applicant had claimed that her husband had worked for an international company but that she had submitted no documents in support of this claim.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-177836
22 septembre 2017
The next day, the applicant was allowed to leave the State.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1010JUD003857897
10 octobre 2002
The doctor concluded that the applicant would be unfit for work for five days. 10.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0113JUD002817310
13 janvier 2015
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1218JUD003066304
18 décembre 2008
They drove to the place the next day and Mr A.F. and his father waited for the applicant in the car.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1016JUD006127500
16 octobre 2008
The injuries were noted by a medical doctor two days after his release, and were apparently visible on photographs taken one day after his release (see paragraphs 15 and 16 above).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0116DEC002628095
16 janvier 1996
While the applicant claims that he paid heed to this advice and took steps to register his dog, he did not have his dog muzzled, on a lead or restrained in any way when he was again stopped four days later
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0705DEC007060214
5 juillet 2016
In support of his claim, the applicant submitted a baptism certificate dated 23 December 2007 issued by the Kores Church in Apeldoorn.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0404DEC006394509
4 avril 2017
Others had been harassed or abused by drivers or other individuals when they returned home from school after dark. 21.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1216JUD000688702
16 décembre 2010
The court rejected his claims for compensation in respect of ill-treatment as unsubstantiated.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1201DEC006109300
1 décembre 2005
to the claimant company’s agricultural activity, by creating in the very heart of the farm an easement capable of rendering impossible any development of the farm, or even of seriously undermining its day-to-day
CASELAW;ADVISORYOPINIONS;PROTOCOL16;OPINIONS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-8474673-12010815
5 mars 2026
concerned an unenforceable ecclesiastical claim the domestic courts had to terminate the proceedings.