CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1216JUD003977807
16 décembre 2010
The Court has consistently held that costs and expenses will not be awarded under Article 41 unless it is established that they were actually and necessarily incurred, and were reasonable
Page 41 sur 361
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1120DEC000619406
20 novembre 2012
It did not award any costs to the applicant.
civ3
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2015:C300617
2 juin 2015
les deux premiers moyens du pourvoi de la société Axa, pris en leurs première et trois premières branches et le deuxième moyen de la société le Logement Francilien, réunis, ci-après annexé : Vu l'article
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0617JUD007071910
17 juin 2014
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 3 OF THE CONVENTION 35.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0530JUD005109910
30 mai 2017
The relevant parts of Articles 3 and 5 § 1 read as follows: Article 3 “No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.” Article 5 § 1 “1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0920DEC007249717
20 septembre 2022
In relation to the articles that were then pleaded, which was most of the articles in play at the trial, but for the wrongfully obtained information the articles would not have been published. 7 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0225JUD003133307
25 février 2020
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE CONVENTION 25.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0628DEC002437294
28 juin 1995
He alleged a violation, by imposition of the court fees after the proceedings had been discontinued, of Article 6 para. 2 of the Convention and of Article 4 (prohibition of arbitrariness) of the
civ2
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2016:C210346
2 juin 2016
F...V... de ses demandes par application de l'article 55 du règlement PS3 de la SNCF ; ( )par arrêt n° 222600 rendu le 29 juin 2001, le Conseil d'Etat a déclaré illégal ledit article 55 du règlement PS3
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1212JUD006532409
12 décembre 2017
Article 5 § 4 of the Convention reads: “4.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1129JUD001090502
29 novembre 2005
AS TO THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLES 6 § 1 AND 13 OF THE CONVENTION AND ARTICLE 1 OF PROTOCOL NO. 1 20.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0224JUD001079120
24 février 2022
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLES 3 AND 13 OF THE CONVENTION 6.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0408JUD000007507
8 avril 2014
In a judgment delivered on 3 March 2009 (“the principal judgment”), the Court held that there was a breach of Article 6 § 1 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention on account
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1114JUD001939111
14 novembre 2013
of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 8 thereof, which provide: Article 8 “1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0920JUD003949602
20 septembre 2005
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION AND ARTICLE 1 OF PROTOCOL NO. 1 12.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1026JUD000152006
26 octobre 2010
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION AND ARTICLE 1 OF PROTOCOL NO. 1 14.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1209JUD003512305
9 décembre 2010
The Court reiterates that where the right claimed is a civil right, the role of Article 6 § 1 in relation to Article 13 is that of a lex specialis , the requirements of Article 13 being absorbed
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0424JUD004652414
24 avril 2018
Article 42 - Return of the child “1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0628JUD001811402
28 juin 2005
The existence of prejudice is relevant only in the context of Article 41 (see Artico v. Italy , judgment of 13 May 1980, Series A no. 37, p. 18, § 35 in fine ). 37.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1215JUD001827304
15 décembre 2005
The applicant also complained about the costs orders made against him and invoked Articles 6, 13 and 14 of the Convention as well as Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.