COMPLAINTS The applicants complain that the High Court’s judgment of 17   December   1997, requiring them to pay Dr Dillerud approximately 1,470,000   Norwegian kroner (NOK) for damages

European law does not require that a parent-child relationship be recognised in respect of a person who is not the child’s biological parent and the judgment in the case of Kroon   and Others &#xa0

    By a decision of 25 May 2007 the Põhja Police Prefecture, in misdemeanour proceedings, fined the fourth applicant 420 kroons (EEK, corresponding to approximately twenty-seven euros (EUR))

In the second paragraph on page 1 of the reply [of 10 September 1996], it is stated that 'the appellants have a debt to [the Bank] of over NOK 6,000,000' – in other words, over six million kroner !!

Court H.R., Kroon and others judgment of 27 October 1994, Series A no. 297-C, p. 56, paras. 31-32).

The parents were ordered to pay the children 300,000 and 100,000 Norwegian kroner (NOK) (approximately 36,000 and 12,000 euros (EUR)) in compensation for non-pecuniary damage. 8.

prosecutor of Nordland, under an expedited non-judicial procedure (forelegg), proposed to the applicant a suspended sentence of twenty-seven days' military custody (vaktarrest) and a fine of 5,000 Norwegian kroner

A profit of approximately 400,000 Danish kroner (DKK) (equal to approximately 53,700 euros (EUR)) was confiscated. In addition, he was expelled from Denmark with a ban on returning. 12.

The sum of 457,000 Danish kroner (approximately 61,300 euros (EUR)) was confiscated as proceeds from the offences.

    By a District Court judgment of 5 October 2016, he was convicted of insulting a prison officer and was sentenced to six day-fines of 500 Danish kroner   (DKK). 13.

    The present case differs from the above-cited ones in that the applicant was not a public or newsworthy figure within the meaning of the Court’s case-law (see Krone Verlag GmbH & Co.

The City Court ordered the first applicant to pay 25,000 Norwegian kroner (NOK) for non-pecuniary damage to Mr Bratholm but dismissed the latter’s claim for non-pecuniary damage against the second applicant

Exceptionally, other factors may also serve to demonstrate that a relationship has sufficient constancy to create de facto “family ties” (see Kroon and   Others v.

favour of eighteen of the plaintiffs (that is, seventeen of the applicants, namely nos. 1-5, 7-10, 12-14 and 16-20 in the table attached to the present judgment) and awarded each of them 30,000 Danish kroner

    The applicant also claimed 40,731.30 kroons (EEK – approximately corresponding to EUR 2,603) for the costs and expenses incurred before the domestic courts and the Court. 74.

At the time of lodging the application the ground lease rent amounted to 1,622 Norwegian Krone (NOK) (approximately 200 euros (EUR)) per year.

For this and certain other offences (withdrawal of 4,600 Norwegian Krone (NOK) from cash points by using another person’s credit card; driving a stolen moped and the possession of 0.2 gram of hashish)

According to the expert opinion, dated 1 March 2001, the value of the metals was 19,620.90 kroons (EEK) (approximately corresponding to 1,254   euros (EUR)).

According to the agreement, the BRS assumed the obligation to pay 1,000,000,000 Estonian kroons (EEK) (approximately corresponding to 64,000,000 euros (EUR)) for the shares as well as to invest at least

that the lack of a   procedure for bringing the legal position into line with the biological reality flies in the face of the wishes of those concerned and does not in fact benefit anyone (see Kroon