CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-116047
19 décembre 2012
The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.
Page 41 sur 819
ECLI:CEDH:001-170373
13 décembre 2016
The circumstances of the case 2. The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. 3.
ECLI:CEDH:001-117169
11 février 2013
The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant and as they appear from the documents submitted by him, may be summarised as follows.
ECLI:CEDH:001-242883
28 mars 2025
(ii) were effective investigations carried out with respect to the alleged violations?
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0531JUD000178907
31 mai 2011
In the cases of Rašković and Milunović v.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1121DEC006300112
21 novembre 2017
She further alleged that there was a length of metal pipe sticking out of the wall under the window bars to which the clothesline rope was attached, and that it should have caused marks on the body if
ECLI:CEDH:001-161249
9 février 2016
In decisions nos. 92 of 8 February 2002, 323 of 2 April 2002, 320 of 12 February 2003, and 515 of 11 March 2003, the Supreme Court, citing the same reasons as above, decided to remit the case to
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0220JUD000640621
20 février 2024
In the case of M.G. v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0420JUD002829895
20 avril 2004
of the case for reasons of jurisdiction. 57.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0519DEC002363494
19 mai 1994
the applicant's expulsion could be carried out.
ECLI:CEDH:001-150871
6 janvier 2015
The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant company, may be summarised as follows. 1.
ECLI:CEDH:001-115962
28 mars 2006
Forensic tests were carried out at the scene of the crime and ballistic examinations were carried out on an automatic gun and a handgun found at the scene. No autopsies were carried out.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0323DEC001342502
23 mars 2004
It referred to the complexity of the case. The delay was caused by the absence of some of the accused and their counsel at the hearings and the illness of some of the accused and the judge.
Tribunal Administratif de Lyon
ORTA_2206814_20221006
6 octobre 2022
Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête et des mémoires enregistrés les 9 et 27 septembre 2022, la société INEO Rhône-Alpes-Auvergne, représentée par Me Camière, demande au juge des référés, statuant
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0109JUD005303608
9 janvier 2014
On 28 March 2006 the Leninskiy district prosecutor’s office opened criminal case no. 50040 under Article 126 of the Criminal Code (abduction).
cr
61372694cd58014677426b6b
3 avril 2007
vidéo montrant la scène litigieuse ; que Marie Y... faisait valoir qu'elle n'avait jamais pu visionner cette cassette et en discuter la transcription, éventuellement subjective, figurant à la procédure
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0720JUD003395196
20 juillet 2000
I did not notice any marks – no signs of any blows, no haematomas nor anything else – during the examination. I cannot remember whether the patient called me 'Doctor'.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0607JUD007136201
7 juin 2007
Subsequently that case had been joined to criminal case no. 7806.
ECLI:CEDH:001-111078
11 avril 2012
The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1204DEC007084501
4 décembre 2003