Toutefois, ce délai ne court : 1° En cas de réticence, omission, déclaration fausse ou inexacte sur le risque couru, que du jour où l'assureur en a eu connaissance; 2° En cas de sinistre, que du jour où

GÉNÉRALE DE L'OFFRE DE SOINS AGENCE RÉGIONALE DE SANTÉ PROVENCE ALPES CÔTE D'AZUR [Z] [C] Copie exécutoire délivrée le : à : Maître ABOUDARAM Maître GUIGUI Maître COURT-MENIGOZ

The Federal Constitutional Court refused to admit the applicant’s constitutional complaint, noting that the trial court’s assessment and evaluation of evidence had not been confined to the depositions

AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, DEUXIEME CHAMBRE CIVILE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Donne acte à la SNC Sogea Bretagne BTP de ce qu'elle se désiste de son pourvoi en tant que dirigé

THE LAW The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties.

On 19 May 2025 the Court decided to give notice to both Governments of the applicants’ complaints detailed above.

Court the comments of the Applicant in regard to matters arising in the present proceedings". by the Irish Government, in their Counter-Memorial: "May it please the Court: (1) to decline jurisdiction

They argued that since the composition of the trial court was unlawful the appellate court should quash the lower court’s judgment in its entirety.

On 13   November   2002 the court found the applicant guilty of thirteen counts of aggravated murder, infliction of grievous bodily injuries, illegal possession of firearms, banditry, and robbery

des documents suivants : 1) le « courrier SANEF » portant sur l'abattage des arbres jugés dangereux ; 2) les résultats d'analyse de « la boulette de viande empoisonnée » ; 3) le « courrier des Beaux-Arts

  ARTICLE 2 OF PROTOCOL No. 1 Complaint not pursued before the Court. Conclusion : no need to examine it of the Court's own motion (unanimously). IV.

#Eelotsusetaotlus: High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen's Bench Division (Divisional Court) - Ühendkuningriik.#Käibemaks.#Kohtuasi C-408/98.

    On 11   August 2011 the Regional Court found the first applicant guilty on two counts of abuse of power and two counts of bribery and sentenced her to 7.5   years’ imprisonment

The court considered the circumstances of the case as extraordinary and concluded that the applicants could abscond and interfere with the course of justice.

de conclusion d'un protocole d'accord postérieur à la fin de cette action, quand la prescription de cette action devait courir à compter de la fin de la mission au cours de laquelle la faute aurait été

    On 27 September 2023 the Riga Regional Court, acting as a second ‑ instance court, delivered a summary judgment partly overturning the first-instance court’s judgment in respect of

On 15 September 2000 the court confirmed that the hearing would cover counts nos. 2-9 (counts 2, 4, 6 and 8 (dishonesty as a debtor) concerned the applicant).

course of the proceedings. 12.

  The review recommends among other things that:   The Court deal only with properly completed application forms; Satellite offices be established in key countries producing high numbers of inadmissible

Dispute concerning exact course of proceedings in the Court of Appeal, on which the European Court had to decide on the basis of the available evidence.