Marcelli, avocat général, Mlle Jacomy, greffier de chambre ; Sur le rapport de M. le conseiller Deville, les observations de la SCP Nicolay et de Lanouvelle, avocat des consorts Y..., de la SCP Piwnica

Grimaldi, conseiller, les observations de la SCP Nicolay et de Lanouvelle, avocat de la société Fondis, de Me Guinard, avocat de M. X..., les conclusions de M.

[W], de la SCP Duhamel-Rameix-Gury-Maitre, avocat de la société Groupama Gan vie, de la SCP Nicolaÿ, de Lanouvelle, avocat de la société Paris d'Aumale, après débats en l'audience publique du 13 décembre

rectification de l'erreur du bureau de vote, puis a annulé son élection après avoir constaté qu'une irrégularité avait été commise dans le décompte des voix devant lui être attribuées et que celle-ci le privait

LA COUR DE CASSATION, PREMIERE CHAMBRE CIVILE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le pourvoi formé par : 1°/ Monsieur Michel X..., 2°/ Madame Nicole X..., née Y..., demeurant ensemble à Paris (7ème

    Privatisation de l'usine appartenant à la coentreprise 19.

The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 14 (prohibition of discrimination) taken together with Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life) of the European Convention

United Kingdom The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 10   April 2012 as a Chamber composed of:   Lech Garlicki, President,   David Thór Björgvinsson,   Nicolas

He relied on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property) and Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life) of the European Convention on Human Rights.

They rely on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property) and Articles 8 (right to respect for private and family life) and 13 (right to an effective remedy) of the European Convention on Human

(“the second applicant”), a single-member private Romanian company owned by the first applicant, on 19 April 2007. 2.

  The Court held unanimously that there had been: a violation of Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life) of the European Convention on Human Rights; a violation of Article 13 (right

    Proceedings for defamation and libel brought by the applicant On 22 September 1999 the applicant brought a private prosecution ( prywatny akt oskarżenia ) in the Gniezno District Court (

O'Boyle , Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 23 September 2003, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.

O'Boyle , Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 3 September 2002, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.

O’Boyle , Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 8 October 2002, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.

,   Ljiljana Mijović,   Ján Šikuta,   Mihai Poalelungi,   Nebojša Vučinić,   Vincent A. de Gaetano, judges, and Lawrence Early, Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private

SECTION DECISION Application no. 38688/06 by Emília HERZOGOVÁ against Slovakia The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 20   October 2010 as a Chamber composed of:   Nicolas

Le 13 juin 2000, il avait été arrêté à Eminönü pour avoir protester contre la privatisation des universités.