The proceedings in question had lasted approximately one year and nine months prior to 5 November 1992.

He also referred to the designation of the district on the basis that adequate provision had been made for gypsies and that during 1993 29 vacancies had arisen on private sites and an average of 7 vacancies

In fact, another person who had been convicted of the same murder had been found dead in prison.

VILA AMIGÓ     Mrs   M. HION     Mr   R. NICOLINI       Mrs   M.F.

The prosecutor told them that Necati Aydin and Mehmet Ay had been released, and that they had not been re-arrested. He suggested that the families apply elsewhere for information.

In those circumstances, they submit that proper regard has been had by the authorities to the applicants' individual circumstances and that the measures are compatible with Article 8 (Art. 8).

  However, detention pursuant to a court order is unlawful where it has been shown that it had no basis in domestic law or was arbitrary (cf. Eur. Court HR, Tsirlis and Kouloumpas v.

Prior to the meeting K had mentioned that her brothers had been hit with a poker. It was decided that this statement would be investigated.

  However, as he had known the applicant for many years he had considered it appropriate to state the reasons for his decision regarding the applicant.

had been paid or had claimed the reward.

        Since his release on bail on 10 December 1993 and despite his requests to the police through lawyers acting on his behalf, he has not had his case-files, including

The applicant stated that he had spent the previous night at a friend's house and that he had returned to his own house at 09.00 hours that day.

The applicant and Mr Z. had been involved in a dispute about money which had been the object of judicial proceedings between them.

  It further noted that the Committee had accepted the evidence of the health care assistant and rejected that of the applicant.

He, inter alia, reiterated the defence which he had made earlier. He also stated that the State Security Court had convicted him without duly hearing his defence.

According to the court, it had moreover not been claimed that the children had been directly confronted with the article in the schoolteaching they received, or that this was likely in the immediate future

VILA AMIGÓ            Mrs.   M. HION            Mr.    R.

Therefore, the applicant has not suffered any prejudice as a consequence of not becoming aware of the order before September 1993.

If the Membership Tribunal had not found that the applicant company had breached IMRO's rules, IMRO would have been liable to pay the applicant company substantial damages because of the intervention orders

the reasons for which the detention had originally been decided had not ceased to exist.