Normally the applicants would have been required to seek permission to appeal within four weeks of the decision of Judge Diamond QC.

The District Court had attached too much weight to the fact that imprisonment was the normal sentence for the crime.

Luis López Guerra, President,   Helena Jäderblom,   George Nicolaou,   Johannes Silvis,   Branko Lubarda,   Pere Pastor Vilanova,   Alena Poláčková, judges, and Stephen Phillips

Représentant : Me Christophe Y..., Postulant, avocat au barreau de VERSAILLES, vestiaire : 627 - N° du dossier 17600 - Représentant: Me Daniel A... et Me Jean-Philippe I... de la SELAS FIDAL DIRECTION

FRANCE RHONE-ALPES AUVERGNE prise en la personne de son représentant légal en exercice [Adresse 3] [Localité 6] représentée par Me DUMONT ET TOURANCHET, avocat au barreau de PARIS substitué par Me Philippe

éléments financiers faisant apparaître en 2008 un patrimoine final net de 8. 146. 580 ¿ ; qu'une part importante de ce patrimoine, 5. 171. 643, 60 ¿, résultait de la détention d'actions de la Société Normande

Jean-Philippe Arruebo-Mannier, rapporteur public. Considérant ce qui suit : 1. M.

Luis López Guerra, President,   Helena Jäderblom,   George Nicolaou,   Johannes Silvis,   Dmitry Dedov,   Branko Lubarda,   Pere Pastor Vilanova, judges, and Stephen Phillips

    The Court reiterates that, normally, the six-month period runs from the final decision in the process of exhaustion of domestic remedies.

Serghides, President,   Erik Wennerström,   Lorraine Schembri Orland, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 10 December 2019, Delivers the following

    Normally, the six-month period runs from the final decision in the process of exhaustion of domestic remedies.

xa0; Luis López Guerra, President,   Helena Jäderblom,   Helen Keller,   Dmitry Dedov,   Branko Lubarda,   Pere Pastor Vilanova,   Alena Poláčková, judges, and Stephen Phillips

Serghides,   Jolien Schukking, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 7 November 2017, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE

Ukraine, The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Mark Villiger, President,   Karel Jungwiert,   André Potocki, judges, and Stephen Phillips

Serghides,   Jolien Schukking,   María Elósegui, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 5 February 2019, Delivers the following judgment, which was

L'ADMINISTRATION DES DOUANES, partie poursuivante, contre l'arrêt de la cour d'appel de BESANCON, chambre correctionnelle, en date du 23 mars 1999, qui, après relaxe de Michel Y..., André C... et Philippe

However, in its principal judgment the Court accepted that the applicants could be regarded as the owners of the land in issue or at least as having an interest that would normally be protected by Article

The “relevant day” referred to in subsections (2) and (4) is normally the day six years before proceedings were started against the defendant (section   10(8)).

justify a departure from the normal rule ..."