CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1214DEC000689222
14 décembre 2023
} .s8E0918A8 { width:37.55pt; display:inline-block } .sF64F4F6C { width:139.77pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1208DEC005456321
8 décembre 2022
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0118DEC002820922
18 janvier 2024
} .s8D17D8A5 { width:127.42pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1109JUD007217317
9 novembre 2023
:avoid } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s9D025815 { width:20.21pt; display:inline-block } .s8D17D8A5 { width:127.42pt; display:inline-block } .sAD28297D { width:50.9pt; display:inline-block
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0312JUD003405124
12 mars 2026
d’Appel de Rome - R.G. 52824/2017, 09/01/2018   19/01/2022           08/02/2022   en cours Plus de 4 année(s) et 5 jour(s)     en cours Plus de 3 année(s)
CASELAW;REPORTS;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0521REP002512494
21 mai 1997
:inline-block } .s7058A54 { width:0.55pt; display:inline-block } .sD8BC159B { width:10.12pt; display:inline-block } .s319480FA { width:17.18pt; display:inline-block } .s6E6905B9 { width:31.46pt; display
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0607DEC002081702
7 juin 2005
} .sB040461F { width:230.11pt; display:inline-block } .s50892CF2 { width:19.21pt; display:inline-block } .sF52EF7EE { width:229.11pt; display:inline-block } DEUXIÈME SECTION DÉCISION SUR LA RECEVABILITÉ
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0504DEC005260622
4 mai 2023
} .s8E0918A8 { width:37.55pt; display:inline-block } .s5AAEE4F1 { width:148.75pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1108DEC004750307
8 novembre 2022
} .s68D1564D { width:34.89pt; display:inline-block } .sC6B6F7B3 { width:150.43pt; display:inline-block } .s5D826FD4 { width:25.88pt; display:inline-block } .s1B61D60 { width:156.43pt; display:inline-block
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0312DEC000372424
} .sBED24249 { width:127.41pt; font-family:Arial; display:inline-block } .s935FFEBF { width:7.54pt; font-family:Arial; display:inline-block } .sDCEB1D12 { width:138.09pt; font-family:Arial; display:inline-block
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0913DEC005809714
13 septembre 2018
} .sE174D402 { width:142.09pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1031DEC004059712
31 octobre 2017
(the second applicant), are Austrian nationals who were born in 1973 and 1972 respectively and live in Vienna.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0902JUD002558694
2 septembre 1997
} .s4DDC5C9D { width:5.02pt; text-indent:0pt; display:inline-block } .s85325123 { width:28.35pt; text-indent:0pt; display:inline-block } .s1842DCD4 { width:54.86pt; text-indent:0pt; display:inline-block
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1207DEC001280510
7 décembre 2010
} .sE54F50AA { width:181.76pt; display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block } FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 12805/10 by Anna HUTÁROVÁ against Slovakia The European
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0624DEC004258820
24 juin 2025
} .sDDE12EF4 { width:118.07pt; display:inline-block } .sF66F4DA4 { width:23.21pt; display:inline-block } .sC6B6F7B3 { width:150.43pt; display:inline-block } QUATRIÈME SECTION DÉCISION Requête n o 42588
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0301JUD000051004
1 mars 2007
} .sE9B40630 { width:19.85pt; text-indent:0pt; display:inline-block } .s5CD64447 { width:5.65pt; text-indent:0pt; display:inline-block } .s6C75166 { width:214.51pt; text-indent:0pt; display:inline-block
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0831DEC005460622
31 août 2023
} .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .s8D17D8A5 { width:127.42pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0311DEC002342318
11 mars 2021
vertical-align:super } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0202DEC003280506
2 février 2010
} .sB2998F02 { width:154.72pt; display:inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .sC1AC44A4 { width:228.11pt; display:inline-block } THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 32805
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1119DEC005751218
19 novembre 2020
Page 46 sur 451