Norway , no. 56568/00, § 39, ECHR 2003 ‑ II (extracts); Ringvold v.   Norway , no. 34964/97, § 41, ECHR 2003 ‑ II; and Moullet v.   France (no.   2) (dec.), no.

criminal responsibility does not, as such, preclude the establishment of civil or other forms of liability arising out of the same facts on the basis of a less strict burden of proof (see, for example, Ringvold

    Pendant que le requérant purgeait sa peine de prison à la colonie Ringwil à Hinwil, les services pénitentiaires rédigèrent, le 12 novembre 1998, un rapport provisoire sur la conduite de l

raisonnement suivi par la juridiction civile et les termes qu’elle avait employés établissaient manifestement un lien entre la procédure pénale et l’action indemnitaire (voir, mutatis mutandis , l’arrêt Ringvold

Dans l'affaire Ringvold c.

  Norvège , n o 56568/00, §§ 41-43, CEDH 2003 ‑ II, et Ringvold   c.

Norway , no. 56568/00, § 39, ECHR 2003 ‑ II (extracts); Ringvold v. Norway , no. 34964/97, § 41, ECHR 2003-II; Moullet v. France (no. 2) (dec.), no. 27521/04, CEDH 2007 ‑ X).

complaints in the appeal against the second-instance judgment, did not declare them inadmissible, but rather examined them on the merits and dismissed them as unfounded (see paragraph 20 above and contrast Ringwald

    Enfin, il considère que les dispositions de l’article 6 § 2 de la Convention ne sont pas applicables en l’espèce, dès lors qu’en l’espèce, comme dans l’affaire Ringvold c.

pénale contre l'intéressé ne peut pas être remise en cause, cela ne doit pas faire obstacle à l'établissement de certaines conséquences sur le plan civil à raison des mêmes faits ( mutatis mutandis , Ringvold

GCEB 25 avenue de la Pointe Ringale 91250 SAINT-GERMAIN-LES-CORBEIL représentée par Maître Patrick MENEGHETTI de la SELEURL MENEGHETTI AVOCATS, avocats au barreau de PARIS, vestiaire #W0014 DÉFENDERESSES

However, the LEA had meanwhile managed to find him a place at the Sheiling School at Ringwood in Hampshire, one of the Rudolph Steiner Camphill Schools which the consultant had described as "outstanding

France (dec.), no. 30392/03, 27   May 2008; and Ringwald v. Croatia (dec.) [Committee], nos.   14590/15 and 25405/15, §§ 54-56, 22 January 2019). 60.

believing that the offence had been committed by the first and fourth applicants and that the investigation could not be conducted by other, less intrusive, means (see paragraph 8 above and compare Ringwald

Serbia , no. 3363/08, § 113, 7 January 2014; see also, for illustrative purposes, Ringwald v.   Croatia (dec.) [Committee], no. 25405/15, §§ 54-58, 22 January 2019). 38 .

criminal responsibility does not, as such, preclude the establishment of civil or other forms of liability arising out of the same facts on the basis of a less strict burden of proof (see, for example, Ringvold

Switzerland , 25 March 1983, Series A no. 62; Ringvold v. Norway , no. 34964/97, §§ 36-39, ECHR   2003 ‑ ...).

  4248/02, 8 July 2004; and Ringvold v. Norway , no. 34964/97, § 38, ECHR 2003 II).

    While the applicant was serving his prison sentence at the Ringwil prison colony in Hinwil, the prison services issued an interim report on 12   November 1998 on his conduct, according

proceedings or their procedural termination should not preclude the establishment of civil liability to pay compensation arising out of the same facts on the basis of a less strict burden of proof (see Ringvold