Conseiller, magistrats délégués à la protection des majeurs, GREFFIER : Madame Catherine DEAN, lors des débats, et Madame Huguette NEVEU, lors du prononcé, MINISTERE PUBLIC : Monsieur Martial GUILLOIS

Conseiller, magistrats délégués à la protection des majeurs, GREFFIER : Madame Catherine DEAN, lors des débats, et Madame Huguette NEVEU, lors du prononcé, MINISTERE PUBLIC : Monsieur Martial GUILLOIS

Y..., demeurant 70, avenue Bois Guimier, 94100 Saint-Maur-des-Fossés, 2°/ de M. Alain C..., demeurant ..., 3°/ de M.

Z... a acquis de la société civile immobilière (SCI) Résidence du Port de la Guittière deux lots d'un ensemble immobilier en l'état futur d'achèvement pour le prix de 1 248 000 francs ; que la construction

B, - et les conclusions de Mme Guidi, rapporteure publique. Considérant ce qui suit : 1.

application, as declared admissible by the Commission on 6   September 1995, the applicant complained of the interception and the recording of his telephone conversations as well as of the fact that his guilt

SUR LA PREMIERE BRANCHE DU MOYEN UNIQUE : ATTENDU QU'IL RESULTE DES ENONCIATIONS DE L'ARRET ATTAQUE QUE ROUSSEL, POYANT, GUILLERIE, SASSIER, LIGEARD, ROY ET LEROUX-CHRETIEN, ASSOCIES DE LA LAITERIE COOPERATIVE

Claude Y..., 2°/ Mme Eugénie Y..., née X..., demeurant ensemble 2, Village de La Guillerie, 50 680 Moon-sur-Elle, en cassation d'un arrêt rendu le 14 mars 1996 par la cour d'appel d'Aix-en-Provence

Vu la requête enregistrée le 31 mars 1988 au secrétariat du Contentieux du Conseil d'Etat, présentée par M. et Mme Yves Y..., demeurant Kersaliou à Guiler-sur-Goyen en Plogastel-St-Germain (29143) ; M.

Thereupon, the Regional Court supplemented the minutes accordingly, stating that the evidence before it did not carry a finding of guilt.

The record of interrogation of the accused of 6 June 1995 showed that Grabchuk M.M. acknowledged her guilt of an offence of negligence.

This states that no measures can be taken when guilt has not been determined by a judge. I am asking you to reject the request. ...

Accordingly, the applicants alleged that the Court of Appeal had not only indirectly modified the proven facts, but it had also reassessed the subjective element of their guilt in the finding that they

She found, however, no public pronouncement of guilt and no determination of a criminal charge. B.

    In substantive terms, the applicant argued that the references to him in the judgment amounted to a clear statement of his guilt, thereby guaranteeing that his own trial would be unfair.

  The exclusion of compensation in the challenged provision was not based on guilt, but on continued existence of suspicion.

They considered the Chamber adjudicating the case of G.L. had taken a definite position on the applicants’ guilt.

Consequently, only two questions had been put to the jury about the applicant’s guilt.

Law no. 4616 provides for the suspension of criminal proceedings in respect of certain offences committed before 23   April 1999, without reaching a definitive finding as to guilt. 9.