against a court order authorising his initial placement in custody, and a violation of his presumption of innocence.

family and his own social rehabilitation."

  During his imprisonment his marriage broke down and he has had little contact with his five children.         The first applicant's father died in 1967.

    COMPLAINTS     The applicant complains that his rights to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 and to respect for his home under Article 8

Ont été entendus au cours de l'audience publique : - le rapport de Mme B ; - les observations orales de Me Hiesse, représentant Mme A, qui maintient les conclusions tendant au versement de frais irrépétibles

Ont été entendus au cours de l'audience publique : - le rapport de Mme C ; - les observations orales de Me Hiesse, représentant Mme A B, qui maintient les conclusions tendant au versement frais irrépétibles

  placed a plastic bag over his head, closing off his access to air, while M. held him down.

The applicant did not give his consent to his transfer to Poland.

Both his children have Netherlands nationality and have been recognised ( erkend ) by the applicant. Neither his partner nor his children speak Turkish. 20.

The applicant was informed of his right to remain silent and his right to legal assistance and admitted his guilt “in part”.

The questioning was held in the presence of his lawyer. 13.     Later, the applicant changed his lawyer during the pre-trial investigation, but he subsequently reappointed G as his lawyer.

    On the same day the applicant filed a request with the police, seeking payment of his fees in accordance with the Tariff issued by the Bar Association. 9.

On his arrival at the prison he was put in a room on his own, stripped, punched, kicked, the soles of his feet were beaten, and he was raped with a stick.

His parents are divorced. He spent most of his formative years with his father and sister in Libya.

  He further complains under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention that the issue of the contested building permit interferes with his right to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions.

LA COUR DE CASSATION, PREMIÈRE CHAMBRE CIVILE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le moyen unique : Attendu, selon l'arrêt attaqué (Paris, 7 décembre 2011), statuant en référé que le 31 décembre 2010, le

, which reads: “Everyone who is deprived of his liberty by arrest or detention shall be entitled to take proceedings by which the lawfulness of his detention shall be decided speedily by a court and his

In his view, his client was physically and mentally a prisoner (carcerato) on Asinara; he was vegetating there in conditions worse than those of his detention on remand.

, of his right to respect for his correspondence, as guaranteed by Article 8 § 1 of the Convention. 27.

means at his trial for murder.