Switzerland; 18.2.1997, Nideröst-Huber v. Switzerland; 28.5.1997, Pauger v. Austria; 29.5.1997, Georgiadis v. Greece; 24.11.1997, Szücs v. Austria   In the case of Werner v.

it appears at that time that the “officer” may later intervene in subsequent criminal proceedings on behalf of the prosecuting authority, his independence and impartiality may be open to doubt (see Huber

Court HR, Huber v. Switzerland judgment of 23 October 1990, Series A no. 188, p. 18, para. 43; Brincat v.   Italy judgment of 26   November 1992, Series A no. 249-A, p. 12, paras.

  11-12, §§   20-22; Huber v.   Switzerland , judgment of 23   October 1990, Series   A no.   188, pp.   17-18, §§   41-43 ; and Assenov and Others v.

GRÄSSER 05/10/2006 26/03/2007 43155/08 GRUMANN 21/10/2010   57249/00 HERBOLZHEIMER 31/07/03 31/10/03 20027/02 HERBST 11/01/2007 11/04/2007 397/07+ HOFFER AND ANNEN 13/01/2011 20/06/2011 1182/05 HUB

CIA agents were authorised to use four standard interrogation techniques (sleep deprivation not exceeding 72 hours; continual use of light or darkness in a cell, loud music and white noise (background hum

The CIA agents were authorised to use 4 standard interrogation techniques (sleep deprivation not exceeding 72 hours; continual use of light or darkness in a cell, loud music and white noise (background hum

The CIA agents were authorised to use 4 standard interrogation techniques (sleep deprivation not exceeding 72 hours; continual use of light or darkness in a cell, loud music and white noise (background hum

  59895/00, 21   March 2002, and Karalyos and Huber v. Hungary and Greece , no. 75116/01, § 40, 6 April 2004). 75.

Switzerland; 18.2.1997, Nideröst ‑ Huber v. Switzerland; 26.8.1997, De Haan v. the Netherlands   In the case of Helle v.

requires each party to be given a reasonable opportunity to present his or her case under conditions that do not place that litigant at a substantial disadvantage vis-à-vis the opponent (see, Nideröst-Huber

Until the end of the siege the Cultural Centre remained a hub for communicating with relatives and providing medical and psychological assistance to them. 59.

01 GRÄSSER 05/10/2006 26/03/2007 43155/08 GRUMANN 21/10/2010   57249/00 HERBOLZHEIMER 31/07/03 31/10/03 20027/02 HERBST 11/01/2007 11/04/2007 397/07+ HOFFER ET ANNEN 13/01/2011 20/06/2011 1182/05 HUB

Court HR, Huber v. Switzerland judgment of 23 October 1990, Series A no. 188, p. 18, para. 43; Brincat v. Italy judgment of 26 November 1992, Series A no. 249-A, p. 12, paras. 20-21; Comm.

Both the Commission ( Huber v. Switzerland , no. 12794/87, Commission decision of 9 July 1988, Decisions and Reports (DR) 57, p.   251 (265)) and the Court ( Voggenreiter v.

Turkey; 18.2.1997, Nideröst-Huber v. Switzerland In the case of Sakık and Others v.

evidence needed for their claims to succeed, but also to have knowledge of, and comment on, all evidence adduced or observations filed, with a view to influencing the court’s decision (see Nideröst-Huber

Finland judgment of 19 July 1995, Series A no. 322, p. 16, para. 42 and the further references therein; Nideröst-Huber v. Austria, Comm. Report 23.10.95, para. 39).   66.

Switzerland judgment of 4 December 1979, Series A no. 34, p. 13, para. 31, Huber v. Switzerland judgment of 23 October 1990, Series A no. 188, p. 18, paras. 42-43 and Brincat v.