The Court observed that the Austrian courts qualified the comments as statements of fact; but, in the Court's view, they were value judgments.

The Constitutional Court found that bringing the said provision in conformity with the Court’s case-law could not be achieved by a binding interpretation, since that provision was unambiguous.

the Court’s official reports (Series A or Reports of Judgments and Decisions).

Judgment of the Court of 28 January 1992.#Hanns-Martin Bachmann v Belgian State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling: Cour de cassation - Belgium.

replacement: admissible The applicant, who was charged with murder and participation in an armed gang, was tried on these counts in the District Court and sentenced to life imprisonment.

GUÉRIN président, R É P U B L I Q U E F R A N Ç A I S E ________________________________________ AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANÇAIS _________________________ LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE

Ordonnance de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 29 septembre 1983.#Cour des comptes des Communautés européennes contre Calvin E. Williams.#Affaire 9/81 - Interprétation.

La cour déclare en conséquence Mr [B] recevable en sa demande en paiement d'heures supplémentaires.

duquel il a été rendu compte des débats à la Cour.

Après l'arrêt de la Cour de cassation, il est définitivement jugé que, - M.

COUR D'APPEL DE VERSAILLES Code nac : 53L 16e chambre ARRET N° CONTRADICTOIRE DU 08 OCTOBRE 2020 N° RG 19/01216 - N° Portalis DBV3-V-B7D-S7DN AFFAIRE : [N] [I] C/ [X

Copies exécutoires RÉPUBLIQUE FRANÇAISE délivrées aux parties le : AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANÇAIS COUR D'APPEL DE PARIS Pôle 2 - Chambre 3 ARRÊT DU 30 NOVEMBRE 2020

rendu de la cour d'appel.

    On 27 April 2009 the Warsaw District Court found the applicant guilty of two counts of slander and sentenced him to a fine. 30.

    On an appeal lodged by the applicant, the Court of Appeal upheld the District Court’s judgment.

    The Court’s assessment The Court observes that, in the context of the criminal proceedings against a third person, the applicant asserted his right to part of the money seized in the course

The court held its first session on 29 November 2001. In the course of the proceedings, the court was presented with written evidence, including 94 documents submitted by the applicant.

Remaining complaints not the subject of any written or oral submissions by the applicant in the proceedings before the Court - the Court does not consider these complaints to have been maintained and sees

There he was convicted of two counts of murder and aggravated robbery and sentenced to life imprisonment, after the trial court had ruled that his “guilt was of particular gravity”.

    On 1 October 2019 the applicants sent a letter to the Court asking that their application be restored to the Court’s list of cases.