CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

5 538 résultats pour « Keppler FILS »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0521DEC000444708

Admin. suprême

21 mai 2013

21 mai 2013

The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants and according to the case file, may be summarised as follows.

Source officielle

Page 52 sur 277

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-116574

Admin. suprême

16 décembre 2012

16 décembre 2012

The applicants took varied steps to obtain the information held on their files from the earliest in 1997, eventually resulting in decisions of the Supreme Administrative Court in 2000.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-3160683-3514759

Admin. suprême

8 juin 2010

8 juin 2010

That Law gives all Romanian citizens the right to inspect the personal files held on them by the Securitate (the Romanian intelligence service under the former regime) and, with regard to civil society

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0108DEC005157899

Admin. suprême

8 janvier 2002

8 janvier 2002

[which] does not appear on the list kept by the National Institute of Industrial Property...

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:0906DEC001178785

Admin. suprême

6 septembre 1988

6 septembre 1988

  It is true, to send you to Rampton would involve you being kept under secure conditions and to that extent would keep the public from you.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0909DEC003419996

Admin. suprême

9 septembre 1998

9 septembre 1998

Rights and Fundamental Freedoms;     Having regard to the application introduced on 22 July 1996 by Graham Ernest GALLOWAY against the United Kingdom and registered on 17 December 1996 under file

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0513DEC002562608

Admin. suprême

13 mai 2014

13 mai 2014

    For a period of twelve days in June 2006 the prison authorities kept the first applicant’s cell locked as punishment for the smuggling of a mobile phone by another inmate whereas normally

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0928DEC000946402

Admin. suprême

28 septembre 2006

28 septembre 2006

It then remitted the case-file to the Diyarbakır State Security Court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1201DEC003049296

Admin. suprême

1 décembre 1997

1 décembre 1997

   The applicants further complain under Article 5 para. 3 of the Convention that they were kept in police custody between twelve and fourteen days without being brought before a judge.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0321JUD005347899

Admin. suprême

21 mars 2002

21 mars 2002

    After the completion of the investigation proceedings, the file was transmitted to the Public Prosecutor who, on the basis of the file of the case, proposed to commit the applicant and two

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1014DEC004045798

Admin. suprême

14 octobre 1999

14 octobre 1999

Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms;     Having regard to the application introduced on 4 December 1997 by Francesco Cuzzilla against Italy and registered on 26 March 1998 under file

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0930JUD004884820

Admin. suprême

30 septembre 2021

30 septembre 2021

    The case file was transmitted to the appellate court on 11   February   2021.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2716101-2964270

Admin. suprême

23 avril 2009

23 avril 2009

The Government submitted that there was no such document in the investigation file. The applicants provided a copy of the latter document to the Court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1007DEC002182520

Admin. suprême

7 octobre 2021

7 octobre 2021

    Le droit de visite médiatisé fut mis en place à partir de la fin du mois d’octobre 2017.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-210614

Admin. suprême

27 mai 2021

27 mai 2021

As it appears from the case file material, various items of evidence, including excerpts from the secret recordings involving the applicant, were circulated by the CPO to the media.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0907JUD002665707

Admin. suprême

7 septembre 2017

7 septembre 2017

The case file shows that the applicant was not transferred to the NCO or examined by an oncologist.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-113358

Admin. suprême

7 septembre 2012

7 septembre 2012

An admission entry of 20 March 2009 in G.’s medical file no. 2264 from the Burn Care Hospital described the boy’s condition as “serious”.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1217JUD003267818

Admin. suprême

17 décembre 2024

17 décembre 2024

In the case of Side by Side International Film Festival and Others v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0124JUD002535812

Admin. suprême

24 janvier 2017

24 janvier 2017

Ils prirent contact à cette fin avec une clinique située à Moscou.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1118DEC003173496

Admin. suprême

18 novembre 2004

18 novembre 2004

As the evidence in the case file was too voluminous his attempt was unsuccessful and the applicant was kept in custody until the next day.

Source officielle