CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

1 103 résultats pour « Lallame »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0216JUD003238013

Admin. suprême

16 février 2023

16 février 2023

Lala AFANDIYEVA 1941 Baku  

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0517REP001952592

Admin. suprême

17 mai 1995

17 mai 1995

Court H.R., Asch judgment of 26 April 1991, series A no. 203, p. 10, para. 25, and Lala and Pelladoah judgments of 22 September 1994, to be published in Series A nos. 297-A and B, paras. 26 and 33, respectively

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0730JUD003004902

Admin. suprême

30 juillet 2009

30 juillet 2009

    In the interests of a fair and just criminal process it is of capital importance that the accused should appear at his trial (see Lala v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0922JUD001673790

Admin. suprême

22 septembre 1994

22 septembre 1994

of the Court decided, under Rule 21 para. 6 and in the interests of the proper administration of justice, that a single Chamber should be constituted to consider both the instant case and the case of Lala

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1110JUD005658100

Admin. suprême

10 novembre 2004

10 novembre 2004

out that, in accordance with the Court's case-law, the “crucial” importance of defending an accused person should prevail over the “capital” importance of his appearing at the trial (here, they cited Lala

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1209DEC001085924

Admin. suprême

9 décembre 2025

9 décembre 2025

Lala, a lawyer practising in Vagnhärad. 2.     The Swedish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agents, Ms T. Hydén and Mr F.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0211JUD000927806

Admin. suprême

11 février 2014

11 février 2014

  10071/04, § 43, 1 July 2008) and Lalas v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0519JUD004268406

Admin. suprême

19 mai 2016

19 mai 2016

France , 23 November 1993, § 35, Series A no. 277 ‑ A; Lala v. the Netherlands , 22 September 1994, § 33, Series A no. 297 ‑ A; and De   Lorenzo v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0721JUD000381804

Admin. suprême

21 juillet 2009

21 juillet 2009

In this connection, the Court reiterates that in the context of criminal proceedings it is essentially the responsibility of the courts to ensure that a trial is fair ( Lala v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1215JUD005320399

Admin. suprême

15 décembre 2005

15 décembre 2005

    It is also of crucial importance for the fairness of the criminal justice system that the accused be adequately defended, both at first-instance and on appeal (see Lala v. the Netherlands

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0306JUD001100606

Admin. suprême

6 mars 2012

6 mars 2012

    In the interests of a fair and just criminal process it is of capital importance that the accused should appear at his trial (see Lala v. the   Netherlands , 22 September 1994, § 33,

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0115JUD001773506

Admin. suprême

15 janvier 2015

15 janvier 2015

  3   (c), and is of crucial importance for the fairness of the criminal justice system in general, that the accused must be adequately defended, both at first instance and on appeal (see Lala

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1108JUD007800511

Admin. suprême

8 novembre 2018

8 novembre 2018

Lallas, a lawyer practising in Athens. The Greek Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent’s delegate, Ms A. Magrippi, legal representative A at the State Legal Council. 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0108JUD007426601

Admin. suprême

8 janvier 2009

8 janvier 2009

    It is also of crucial importance for the fairness of the criminal justice system that the accused be adequately defended, both at first-instance and on appeal (see Lala v. the Netherlands

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1018JUD001811402

Admin. suprême

18 octobre 2006

18 octobre 2006

    In the interests of a fair and just criminal process it is of capital importance that the accused should appear at his trial (see Lala v. the Netherlands , 22 September 1994, § 33, Series

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0426JUD002257408

Admin. suprême

26 avril 2016

26 avril 2016

France , 23 November 1993, § 35, Series A no. 277 ‑ A; Lala v. the Netherlands , 22 September 1994, § 33, Series A no. 297 ‑ A; and De Lorenzo v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1009JUD004257507

Admin. suprême

9 octobre 2014

9 octobre 2014

The applicants are: (1)     Ms Larisa Saayeva, born in 1971, (2)     Ms Mariyat Beksultanova, born in 1953, (3)     Mr Islam Saayev, born in 2001, (4)     Ms Lala

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1019DEC002520794

Admin. suprême

19 octobre 1995

19 octobre 1995

Court H.R., Lala judgment of 22 September 1994, Series A no. 297-A, p. 12, para. 26).   4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1019DEC002659695

Admin. suprême

19 octobre 1995

19 octobre 1995

Court H.R., Lala judgment of 22 September 1994, Series A no. 297-A, p. 12, para. 26).   3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1019DEC002520694

Admin. suprême

19 octobre 1995

19 octobre 1995

Court H.R., Lala judgment of 22 September 1994, Series A no. 297-A, p. 12, para. 26).   4.

Source officielle

Page 55 sur 56

← PrécédentSuivant →