Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0309DEC003315811
9 mars 2023
9 mars 2023
Government’s written observations in Albanian and English were sent to the applicant’s representative who was invited to submit by 21 March 2013 any written observations he wished to make in reply on behalf
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1119DEC002988303
19 novembre 2013
19 novembre 2013
The first applicant expressed the wish to pursue the application on behalf of her late husband. The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr N.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-170101
1 décembre 2016
1 décembre 2016
On an unspecified date in 2013 the Federal Agency for Management of State Property brought an action on behalf of the Russian Federation seeking the restitution of the basement to the state.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-4679
28 octobre 2003
28 octobre 2003
10-1 Freedom of expression Statements made by a lawyer in the course of judicial proceedings deemed contrary to professional standards: violation Facts : The applicant is a lawyer who was acting on behalf
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1209DEC001327318
9 décembre 2021
9 décembre 2021
The observations were forwarded to the applicant’s lawyer, who was invited to submit observations on the applicant’s behalf. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1213DEC003481707
13 décembre 2016
13 décembre 2016
when the direct victim dies after the application was lodged with the Court, the applicant’s heirs may pursue the application provided that they have legitimate interest in maintaining the request on behalf
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-196063
27 août 2019
27 août 2019
The applicant alleges that she was not informed about either the questioning of those witnesses or about the participation of a legal aid lawyer on her behalf in that procedure.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0628DEC003679905
28 juin 2011
28 juin 2011
No heirs or close relatives have expressed the wish to pursue the application on his behalf.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-226051
28 juin 2023
28 juin 2023
In 2006 the applicant was expelled from university for being a member of an illegal organisation and having engaged in actions on its behalf on account of his participation in a demonstration, during which
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68140-68608
7 mars 2000
7 mars 2000
unfair because he was not informed in detail of the charges brought against him and because, he claims, the judges incorrectly assessed the evidence against him and refused to hear a witness on his behalf
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1209DEC001327018
9 décembre 2021
9 décembre 2021
The observations were forwarded to the applicant’s lawyer, who was invited to submit observations on the applicant’s behalf. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-7342
6 juillet 2010
6 juillet 2010
Agent’s immunity under the European Agreement relating to Persons Participating in Proceedings of the European Court: request rejected Facts – A witness who had submitted affidavit evidence on behalf
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0407DEC006626517
7 avril 2022
7 avril 2022
The applicant’s complaint under Article 6 § 3 (d) of the Convention concerning the impossibility for him to examine a witness on his behalf was communicated to the Armenian Government (“the Government”
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1018DEC005583007
18 octobre 2016
18 octobre 2016
By letter dated 2 December 2015, the applicant was informed that his then representative could no longer act on his behalf and the applicant was asked to appoint another representative by 15 January 2016
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0114DEC002470208
14 janvier 2014
14 janvier 2014
No heirs or close relatives have expressed the wish to pursue the application on his behalf.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0408DEC000987314
8 avril 2021
8 avril 2021
The observations were forwarded to the applicant’s representative, who was invited to submit observations on behalf of the applicant. No observations were received from the applicant.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0209DEC000044712
9 février 2016
9 février 2016
The observations were forwarded to the applicant’s representative, who was invited to submit observations on behalf of the applicant. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0203DEC004313220
3 février 2022
3 février 2022
The observations were forwarded to the applicant’s representative, who was invited to submit observations on behalf of the applicant. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0404DEC003858706
4 avril 2019
4 avril 2019
they wished to pursue the application in the late applicant’s stead and that Mr Filippo Serino had been conferred a general power of attorney by his sister Mrs Lucia Serino to act on her behalf
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-221122
25 octobre 2022
25 octobre 2022
Relying on Article 6 of the Convention, the applicants complain of an unjustified delay on behalf of the administration to comply with judgment no.
Source officiellePage 56 sur 527