CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

6 070 résultats pour « Spegt »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0701DEC001417602

Admin. suprême

1 juillet 2008

1 juillet 2008

as renamed on 29 June 2001) convicted the applicant of having participated in several robberies as a member of an armed gang and sentenced him to nine years’ imprisonment with deduction of the time spent

Source officielle
TA

Tribunal Administratif de Rouen

ORTA_2301110_20230317

Administratif

17 mars 2023

17 mars 2023

Il n'est pas contesté que la rencontre prévue à 15 h le 18 mars 2023 entre l'ASSE et le HAC va générer un nombre important de spectateurs, d'au moins 22 000, que 900 supporters de l'ASSE vont y assister

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CEDH:002-1237

Admin. suprême

24 novembre 2009

24 novembre 2009

Elle attire de nombreux participants et très souvent des spectateurs.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0113DEC003948198

Admin. suprême

13 janvier 2004

13 janvier 2004

M. and R. spent the night in the applicants’ home in Kokkola.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0330JUD003048516

Admin. suprême

30 mars 2023

30 mars 2023

lack of physical exercise, breaches of hygiene regulations, lack of contact with the outside world)             216 days in compensation for a total period of detention spent

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0214DEC006973501

Admin. suprême

14 février 2006

14 février 2006

According to the authorities, the long time spent in Germany could not prevent his expulsion, as his criminal offences had shown that he had so far not adapted to the living conditions in Germany.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0410DEC001447403

Admin. suprême

10 avril 2006

10 avril 2006

the seriousness and the nature of the crime, that the applicant’s mother and five siblings lived in Turkey, that the applicant had maintained strong contact with them and that almost every year he had spent

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1621649-1712332

Admin. suprême

30 mars 2006

30 mars 2006

It therefore held unanimously there had been no violation of the applicant’s rights under Article 5 § 4 in respect of the period which he spent in pre-trial detention.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1211JUD004059304

Admin. suprême

11 décembre 2007

11 décembre 2007

    The Government submitted that, as the applicant had lodged his complaint under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention on 15 October 2004, the time he had spent in detention between 6 February 1993

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0209JUD002399316

Admin. suprême

9 février 2023

9 février 2023

facilities, no or restricted access to shower, no or restricted access to warm water, no or restricted access to potable water, lack of toiletries 96 days in compensation for a total period of detention spent

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0430JUD000160616

Admin. suprême

30 avril 2026

30 avril 2026

As regards the length of time spent by the applicant in police custody, according to the police logbook, he had been arrested at 2.50   p.m. and released at 5.50   p.m., which was within the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1006JUD003525704

Admin. suprême

6 octobre 2009

6 octobre 2009

It follows that the applicant spent a total of eight years and three months in this form of custody. 14.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2153327-2287469

Admin. suprême

25 octobre 2007

25 octobre 2007

Even if the courts had spent the whole of that period dealing with the case file, they would not be exempted from the obligation to examine the appeal quickly.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0108DEC004264398

Admin. suprême

8 janvier 2004

8 janvier 2004

The applicant argued that the period of 3 years and 8 months that he had spent in detention was not compatible with the “reasonable time” requirement.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0927DEC001231004

Admin. suprême

27 septembre 2005

27 septembre 2005

months and sixteen days corresponding to three years’ forced labour while in Batër Prison; (b) two years, three months and six days under two pardons issued in 1996; (c) one month being the period he had spent

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0221DEC002805508

Admin. suprême

21 février 2012

21 février 2012

It was also ordered that the time that he had already spent on remand would count towards the total period to be spent in prison. 9.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1119DEC001461219

Admin. suprême

19 novembre 2019

19 novembre 2019

It rejected the applicant’s claim that the time should run from the date of his arrest as the time spent in pre ‑ trial detention was not time spent expiating his sentence (which had not yet been

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-177366

Admin. suprême

4 septembre 2017

4 septembre 2017

On 13 September 2011 the military prosecutor of the Kazan Garrison, acting on behalf of the Kazan Higher Military Command School, brought an action against the applicant for the recovery of the money spent

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GCREFERRALS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2713367-2960989

Admin. suprême

21 avril 2009

21 avril 2009

The applicants spent most of their working lives in the United Kingdom, paying National Insurance Contributions in full, before emigrating or returning to South Africa, Australia or Canada.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1013JUD007129517

Admin. suprême

13 octobre 2022

13 octobre 2022

The applicant spent over 200 hours during transport in prison trains in the following conditions: inadequate bedding, no bed linen provided, lack of personal space (0.5 sq. m. per inmate), no electric

Source officielle

Page 58 sur 304

← PrécédentSuivant →

BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.