All the investigative activities that could be carried out in order to establish the persons who have taken [the applicant’s] purse and money and raped her have been completed.

Paragraph   10 provides that the court may not make an order which, in its opinion, is greater than that which the Secretary of State would have been likely to have made under the previous practice

Prosecution witnesses B. and E. have not yet been questioned.

From this perspective, however, we have constantly emphasised that [the applicant] is essentially German-speaking.

who committed the act in question before the law had taken effect, including those persons who are serving the punishment, or have served the punishment but still have a criminal record. 2.

The aim is to ‘assist the recovery’ of districts that have to contend with a cumulation of problems of a social, economic and physical nature.

The parties have not submitted a copy of the judgment of 18 August 2015, nor have they specified the name of the court that delivered it. 19.

, sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre, President,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Nina Vajić,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Julia Laffranque,   Linos-Alexandre

Moreover, within fourteen days of arrival a person deprived of his or her liberty had to have a chest X ‑ ray and a dental examination.

It follows that owners even have to pay the difference between the rent obtained and [the condominium fee].

xa0; 2, which provided that professional facilitators, that is to say those who on a daily basis enter into many transactions on behalf of others, would not be sanctioned unless they knew or ought to have

The parties have not submitted a copy of the relevant decision. 2.

The actions of the above authorities, taken in their entirety, have caused significant pecuniary damage.”

I am satisfied the matters I have outlined placed [M], at the relevant time, at significant risk of physical and emotional harm.” 24.

The state prosecutor considered that Mr Järve should have been informed about the termination sooner, and should have been given the documents indicating the applicant’s wishes.

I want to add that I’m not guilty because I have not received any money”. 27.

Romania (no. 30699/02) The applicant, Emilia Marilena Marin, is a Romanian national who was born in 1947 and lives in Alexandria (Romania).

Article   13 “Everyone whose rights and freedoms as set forth in [the] Convention are violated shall have an effective remedy before a national authority notwithstanding that the violation has been

Only the parties, their representatives and counsel and persons who have an interest in the case are allowed to attend such hearings. THE LAW I.