Jambrek (Article 43 in fine of the Convention and Rule 21 para. 5) (art. 43). 4.

Jambrek (Article 43 in fine of the Convention and Rule 21 para. 5) (art. 43). 5.

Repik (Article 43 in fine of the Convention and Rule 21 para. 4) (art. 43). Subsequently, Mr A.

Their claim was therefore arguable for the purpose of triggering the State’s procedural obligation to carry out an effective domestic investigation into the matter. 17.

contractuelles de non-concurrence et de confidentialité et a méconnu les articles 1134 et 1147 du Code civil, a rompu brutalement ses relations commerciales avec l'intimée, n'a pas rempli ses obligations

The applicant companies submitted that between 1997 and 2003 more than twenty-five first-instance judgments and more than five appeal judgments on the same subject matter had been delivered, together with

    Circular no. AP 86.29.G1 13.     Article 29, third paragraph, of Circular no.

The President of the Grand Chamber decided that this material should be included in the case file despite its being submitted after the close of the written procedure (Rule 38 § 1 in fine ).

The applicant managed to film the incident. Medical certificate of 24/01/2021 by Moscow City Hospital No. 109: bruise to the left parietal area of the head.

    On 19 August 2015 the applicant challenged that refusal before the Kyiv Circuit Administrative Court.

En conséquence, il préconise la suppression pure et simple du mur de clôture sur une largeur équivalente au vallon aérien sur deux mètres au droit du vallon.

    On 26 July 2004 the Justice of the Peace of the 47th Court Circuit of the Prikubanskiy District of Krasnodar partly found against the applicant and ordered him to pay outstanding housing

    On 17 February 2004 the Justice of the Peace of the 4 th Court Circuit of Taganrog granted the applicants’ claims and ordered the Educational Department of the city of Taganrog to pay the

L'indemnisation de ce poste de préjudice doit donc être fixée à la somme de 83 250,36 euros. Quant aux pertes de gains professionnels actuels : 11.

Les actes de pure faculté et ceux de simple tolérance ne peuvent fonder ni possession ni prescription.

    Le 2 février 2014, après son audition, la mère de C.S. remit aux autorités le téléphone et l’ordinateur portables de sa fille. 25 .

Only five days later her son and other conscripts had been forced to leave the military unit and to seek help from the leadership of the Siberian Military Circuit in an attempt to attain protection from

On 16 August 2007 the North Caucasus Circuit Military Court confirmed the ruling of 18 June 2007.

The applicant alleges that the Court of Appeal included this application in the case file without ruling on it. 48.

The applicant has however failed to establish that any salary was outstanding, and has in any event failed to show that she appealed against the sole decision in the Court’s file.