The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows. 1.

:   THE FACTS         The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

    The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. Background 3.

the appended table, Having regard to the declarations submitted by the respondent Government requesting the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows

judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows

It follows that, as established by the domestic courts, the applicants were made to bear a disproportionate burden. 53.

Ezer, of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs; the parties’ observations; Having deliberated, decides as follows: SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE 1.

margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sB343B0AA { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 39879/21 Pasquale BIONDI and Emanuele

Vesna KRUŠKIĆ and others against Croatia lodged on 17 December 2012 STATEMENT OF FACTS   The applicants Ms Vesna Kruškić (“the first applicant”), Mr Nikola Kruškić (“the second applicant”), Ms Emanuela

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows. 1.

The provision reads as follows: “Every natural or legal person is entitled to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions.

          The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows:   A.

    In so far as relevant, Article 34 provides as follows: “The Court may receive applications from any person, non-governmental organisation or group of individuals claiming to be the victim

It follows that, as established by the domestic courts the applicant was made to bear a disproportionate burden. 54.

judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows

judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows

They relied on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, which reads as follows: “Every natural or legal person is entitled to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions.

The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows. 1.

[U] [Y] [Adresse 9] [Localité 17] Représenté par Me Laurent KARILA de la SELAS KARILA SOCIETE D'AVOCATS, avocat au barreau de PARIS, toque : P0264, substitué par Me FOLLOT Laurie, avocat au barreau

    It follows that the Government’s objection as to the alleged abuse of the right of petition must be rejected.