Belgium , judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 158, p. 31, § 89; and Solakov v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia , no. 47023/99, §   57, ECHR 2001 ‑ X ).

A continuing situation may not postpone the application of the six-month rule indefinitely (see   Sokolov and Others v. Serbia   (dec.), no.

.s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sC36A6361 { font-family:Arial; color:#000000 }       FIFTH SECTION             CASE OF SOZONOV

Nevertheless, the Court reiterates that a continuing situation may not postpone the application of the six-month rule indefinitely (see   Sokolov and Others   (dec.), nos.

0pt; border-bottom:1pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .sDF790F1E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } Note d’information sur la jurisprudence de la Cour N o 171 Février 2014 Sokolov

margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 61464/15 Nikita Nikolayevich SOKOLOV

Serbia , no. 41703/06, §§ 17‑21, 2 October 2012; and Sokolov and Others v. Serbia (dec.), nos. 30859/10, § 20, 14 January 2014.

Association TUTELAIRE D’ALSACE Tuteur aux biens et à la personne de Mme [X] [E] [Adresse 3] [Adresse 3] [Localité 5] Madame [X] [E] [Adresse 2] [Adresse 2] [Localité 5] représentées par Me Yuri SOKOLOV

  Russia , no. 30575/08, §§ 91-112, 15 December 2015, Solopova v. Ukraine , no.   17278/18, §§ 10-13, 27 June 2019, with further references).

  In the case of Sokolov and Others v.

domiciliés [...]                                      , contre l'arrêt rendu le 23 septembre 2015 par la cour d'appel de Paris (pôle 3, chambre 1), dans le litige les opposant à la société Fondation Solomon

2016 Dzheddi Fetkhi 05/04/1985 Prokofyeva Viktoriya Pavlovna St Petersburg Kuybyshevskiy District Court of St Petersburg 16/05/2016   7,500     71850/16 18/11/2016 Nikita Anatolyevich Sokov

Mr   Sokolov and Mr   Burykin were other clients of Ms Belinskaya at the relevant time. 50 .

Relying on the Court’s judgment in the case of Solakov v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (no. 47023/99, ECHR 2001 ‑ X), the Supreme Court held that the applicant’s defence rights had

Violation of Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing) of the European Convention on Human Rights     Under Article 41 (just satisfaction) of the Convention, the Court awarded the Grigorios Solomos

margin-bottom:0pt; border-bottom:1pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .sDF790F1E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } Information Note on the Court’s case-law No. 171 February 2014 Sokolov

; 1 of the Convention in respect of their complaints under Article   6 and/or Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 concerning the failure to enforce final and enforceable judgments in their favour (see Sokolov

BANOV Slavco ĆAEV Trajan DIMITROV Petre FILIPOV Ilija GOZEV Bistra ILIEVA Marice ILIEVA Jovan JOVANOV Slavco JOVANOV Ljupka JOVANOVA Ruža LAZAROVA Zorka LAZAROVA Ilinka MANOLEVA Risto RISTOV Spaso SOKOLOV

Ont été entendus au cours de l'audience publique tenue le 19 août 2022 : - le rapport de Mme Charpy, juge des référés, - les observations de Me Capella, substitué par Me Solomou, représentant M.

1438 e réunion des Délégués des Ministres)     Requête n° Affaire Arrêt du Définitif le 40512/13 SERGEY ANTONOV 22/10/2015 22/01/2016 36853/09 SERGEY SMIRNOV 18/12/2018 18/12/2018 17278/18 SOLOPOVA