A further appeal by the applicant was rejected on summary reasoning on 6 August 2015 by the Administrative Jurisdiction Division. No further appeal lay against this ruling. 2.

; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } FOURTH SECTION DECISION Applications nos. 38703/06, 40123/06, 43301/06, 43302/06, 2131/07 and 2141/07 by Lakhdar BOUMEDIENE, Hadj BOUDELAA, Mustafa AIT IDIR, Mohamed

    The applicant, Mr Mohammed Imran Saber, is a Norwegian national who was born in 1978 and lives in Oslo. He was represented before the Court by Mr J.C.

the Italian Republic lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by three Tunisian nationals, Mr Saber Ben Mohamed

Italian Republic lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the   Convention”) by three Tunisian nationals, Mr Saber Ben Mohamed

arbitrary detention, abductions, enforced disappearances, torture and other forms of ill-treatment, rape and other forms of sexual violence against both women and men, unlawful killings, including summary

    In the Executive Summary of its report, the U.S.

/17) against Hungary lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Syrian national, Mr   Abdullah Mohamed

    On 31 October 2011 the Administrative Jurisdiction Division dismissed the applicant’s further appeal on summary reasoning. 14.

Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by four Syrian nationals, Mr Kamal Bader Muhammad Kurdi, Mrs Hamida Abdilhamid Mohammad

    A further appeal lodged by the applicant was rejected on summary grounds by the Administrative Jurisdiction Division on 16 May 2013. No appeal lay against this ruling. 27.

    Further separate appeals by the applicants were rejected on summary reasoning on 19 December 2005, in two distinct rulings given by the Administrative Jurisdiction Division ( Afdeling Bestuursrechtspraak

    On 19 September 2007, the Administrative Jurisdiction Division rejected a further appeal by the applicant on summary grounds, holding: “What has been raised in the grievances ... does not

against the Republic of Turkey lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by an Uzbek national, Mr   Mohammad

against the Republic of Turkey lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by four Iranian nationals, Mr Mohammad

Jongbloed & Zoon (Noordeinde 39, NL-2514 GC ’s-Gravenhage) SUMMARY [1] Judgment delivered by a Grand Chamber France – length of criminal proceedings and their fairness before Criminal Division of Court

A. and Mohamed D.

Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a national of both Switzerland and Egypt, Mr   Saleh   El   Ghatet (“the first applicant”), and an Egyptian national, Mr   Mohamed

Together with an accompanying request for a provisional measure (stay of removal), this further appeal was rejected on 18 July 2012 on the basis of summary reasoning by the President of the Administrative