applicable rules allow no exception to the granting of a referral or where the refusal is based on reasons other than those provided for by the rules, or where the refusal was not duly reasoned (see Ullens

Belgique (déc.), n o   41881/02, 9   octobre 2007, et Ullens de Schooten et Rezabek c. Belgique , n os 3989/07 et   38353/07, § 72, 20 septembre 2011).

for its decision rejecting the request to refer the case for a preliminary ruling, in substance it had failed to comply with the criteria and methodological requirements set forth in Cilfit and in Ullens

in the Convention which protects the individual from arbitrariness by demonstrating to the parties that they have been heard and obliges the courts to base their decision on objective reasons (see Ullens

that, under EU law, the Supreme Court was required to refer the proposed questions to the CJEU, and that its failure to do so, or to give reasons for its decision, breached Article 6 § 1, referring to Ullens

xa0;   Requête N° 22113/93                             Guido ULENS

  Belgique (déc.), n o 41881/02, 9   octobre 2007, Ullens de Schooten et Rezabek c.   Belgique , n os 3989/07 et 38353/07, §   72, 20   septembre 2011, G.S. c.

    La jurisprudence communautaire concernant la procédure de renvoi préjudiciel devant la CJCE figure dans l’affaire Ullens de Schooten et Rezabek c.

Selon le requérant, la Cour de cassation a ainsi refusé de répondre sur le fond à la demande de renvoi de sa question préjudicielle, alors même que sa décision n’était susceptible d’aucun recours ( Ullens

    Les dispositions pertinentes et la jurisprudence de la CJUE relative au mécanisme de questions préjudicielles figurent dans l’arrêt rendu dans l’affaire Ullens de Schooten et Rezabek c.

    La Cour rappelle également que la Convention ne garantit pas, comme tel, un droit à ce qu’une affaire soit renvoyée à titre préjudiciel par le juge interne devant la CJUE ( Ullens de Schooten

  Belgique (déc.), n o 41881/02, 9   octobre 2007, Ullens de Schooten et Rezabek c.   Belgique , n os 3989/07 et 38353/07, § 72, 20 septembre 2011, G.S. c.

relatifs à la procédure du renvoi préjudiciel devant la Cour de justice des communautés européennes, désormais Cour de justice de l’Union européenne (ci-après la Cour de justice) sont exposés dans l’arrêt Ullens

They based their complaint on Ullens de Schooten and Rezabek v.   Belgium , nos. 3989/07 and 38353/07, 20 September 2011.

applicable rules allow no exception to the granting of a referral or where the refusal is based on reasons other than those provided for by the rules, or where the refusal was not duly reasoned (see Ullens

    The general principles on the right of access to a procedure for referring a question to the CJEU were summarised in Ullens de Schooten and Rezabek v.   Belgium (nos.

ascertaining whether the effects of that interpretation are compatible with the Convention (see Rohlena v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 59552/08, § 51, ECHR 2015; see also, specifically in respect of EU law, Ullens

Germany (no. 50053/16, 11 April 2019); Ullens de Schooten and Rezabek v. Belgium (nos. 3989/07 and 38353/07, 20 September 2011); Taxquet v.   Belgium ([GC], no. 926/05, ECHR 2010); and Dhahbi v.

M uller ,   Advisers .   The Court heard addresses by Ms Reidy and Mrs Akçay.   THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE A.