B A, représenté par Me Delilaj, demande au tribunal : 1°) de l'admettre au bénéfice de l'aide juridictionnelle à titre provisoire ; 2°) d'annuler l'arrêté du 12 décembre 2023 par lequel le préfet d'Ille-et-Vilaine

Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête, enregistrée le 30 mars 2024, Mme A B, représentée par Me Delilaj, demande au tribunal : 1°) de lui accorder le bénéfice de l'aide juridictionnelle provisoire

B A, représenté par la SCP Denizeau - Gaborit - Takhedmit, demande au tribunal : 1°) d'annuler la décision en date du 5 août 2020 par laquelle le directeur des ressources humaines du centre hospitalier

The Court has held that the admission of torture evidence can amount to such a flagrant denial of justice (see Othman (Abu Qatada) v. the United Kingdom , no. 8139/09, §§ 258 and 267, ECHR   2012

The Government also claimed that there had been no denial of access to information as the applicant NGO had been provided with all the information that was not restricted and/or had been informed where

Whether and to what extent the denial of access to information constitutes an interference with an applicant’s rights to freedom of expression must be assessed in each individual case and in the light

The Constitutional Court found that the denial of the persecution of Jews under the Nazi regime was an untrue statement of fact and referred in this respect to the countless testimonies of eye-witnesses

Lastly, the Government contended that the denial of access to the Court of Appeal had not been insurmountable, because the applicant had only been required to pay UAH 37 in court fees.

On 8 November 2010 the applicant lodged another claim with the Administrative Court on behalf of the applicant community, challenging the denial of registration by the State Registry Department of the

He claimed that the refusal to grant him legal aid was tantamount to a denial of access to the appellate court. THE LAW A.

       On 27 November 1986 the applicant lodged an appeal (Beschwerde) against the denial of legal aid.

Having regard to the judgment transmitted by the Court to the Committee once it had become final;   Recalling that the violations of the Convention found by the Court in this case concern the denial

Whether and to what extent the denial of access to information constitutes an interference with an applicant’s freedom   of   expression must be assessed in each individual case and in the light

It has not been shown that access to the information sought would have been instrumental for the exercise of his right to freedom of expression and, therefore, its denial did not constitute an interference

respect the Convention organs' case law according to which in certain circumstances the refusal of legal aid in proceedings involving the determination of civil rights and obligations may amount to a denial

The Court observed that the test whether there had been a “flagrant denial of justice” was a stringent standard and went beyond mere irregularities to require a destruction of the very essence of the right

    In so far as the applicant may be understood to complain under Article   6 § 1 of a denial of access to court, it is to be noted that the domestic courts held that, while he had not

Denial of human contact was a dehumanising practice that reinforced the idea that certain people are inferior and not worthy of equal treatment and respect.

The purpose of this second safeguard clause is to avoid any denial of justice (see Holub v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 24880/05, 14 December 2010; Korolev , cited above).

The Court has already examined that remedy and found it effective in respect of complaints about the alleged forced displacement and denial of access to possessions in the villages in south-east Turkey