COUR D'APPEL D'ORLÉANS CHAMBRE COMMERCIALE, ÉCONOMIQUE ET FINANCIÈRE ARRET RECTIFICATIF GROSSES + EXPÉDITIONS : le 20/05/2020 la SCP LAVILLAT - BOURGON la SELARL CASADEI-JUNG ARRÊT du : 20

Le rapport de Mme Jung a été entendu au cours de l'audience publique du 29 janvier 2026 à 10h30. Considérant ce qui suit : M.

    On 15 June 2007 the applicant lodged an appeal against the decision of 8   June 2007.

On 26 June 2002 the Prosecutor’s Office of the Moscow Region instituted criminal proceedings concerning the ill-treatment of detainees in remand prison IZ-50/9 on 23 June 2002.

The latter received and registered the applicant’s complaint on 19 June 2001. 31.

(Moselle), en cassation d'un jugement rendu le 27 mai 1991 par le conseil de prud'hommes de Sarreguemines (section industrie), au profit de l'Entreprise générale Jung Léon et fils, société anonyme, .

    On 27 June 1997, the enforcement proceedings were still pending.

Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the convention"),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Schönenberger and Durmaz, delivered on 20 June

    In June-July 2016 he obtained an opinion of an independent panel of psychiatrists, who concluded that in view of the stable remission the involuntary treatment in no longer necessary.

The 13 th Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation upheld the judgments rendered in respect of applicants, on 25 May, 14 June and 21   June 2004 respectively, and on 13 September 2005 in the case of

On 17 June 2010 the Sremska Mitrovica Commercial Court opened insolvency proceedings in respect of the debtor and the applicant duly reported his claims based on the said judgment.

The applicant remained in a temporary detention facility of the town of Chusovo until his conviction in June 2005.

He was detained there until 24 June 2011, when the Dnipropetrovsk Regional Court of Appeal quashed the above-mentioned judgment, remitted the case to the first-instance court for fresh examination and

On 6 June 2013, allegedly at 12.00 noon, the Kyiv City Court of Appeal quashed the GPO’s initial extradition decision.

On 7   June 2013 investigator K. again refused to open criminal investigation into the accident of 31 December 2011.

uppercase } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } Resolution ResDH(2006)37 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 3 June

    The hearing of 24 June 1993 was postponed, because of a lawyers' strike of indefinite duration, until 2 June 1994, date on which one witness was heard.

accordance with Article 31 (art. 31) of the Convention relating to the application lodged on 14 January 1989 by Mr Giuseppe Lanzano against Italy (Application No. 14725/89);     Whereas on 23 June

On 30 June 2000 the applicant was questioned by police, allegedly under duress, and in the absence of a lawyer.

On 14 June 2001 the Kozmodemyansk Town Court of the Republic of Mari El ordered that the Kozmodemyansk Town Council provide the applicant with a flat.