in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.

In non-jury trials in Northern Ireland, such an application is made to a judge other than the trial judge.

in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial two police officers on whose written statements his conviction was based.

in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements his conviction was based.

His detention was repeatedly extended during the pre-trial stage of the proceedings and during the trial stage the courts repeatedly verified the continued need to detain him.

and ordered the beginning of the trial.

of pre-trial detention: violation   Article 35 Article 35-1 Six month period Date when time starts to run for the purposes of the six-month time-limit in cases of consecutive periods of pre-trial

On 2 October 2019 the applicant submitted a request for release from pre ‑ trial detention with the Athens Criminal Court of Appeal in the context of his criminal trial.

    The victim, Ms T., did not appear in court and her pre-trial statements were read out at the trial.

The Appeal Court and the Supreme Court confirmed the trial court’s judgment.

during the pre-trial investigation.

witnesses examined at the trial. 4.

  As the trial was completely repeated, its outcome was open.

in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.

    At the same hearing, the trial judge read out B.H.’s pre-trial statement (see paragraph 9 above).

On 29 August 2007 the applicant’s lawyer suggested that M.M.’s pre-trial witness statements should be read out at the trial. 6.

It held that the applicant had himself, through his chosen lawyer, asked for a summary trial.

However, for unspecified reasons, he was not examined at the trial. Instead, the trial court allowed the reading out of his pre-trial statement to the investigator.

Both the trial and the appeal proceedings were held in camera.

within a reasonable time or to release pending trial.