Moreover, they did not prevent parents from informing and advising their children, instructing and guiding them in a direction consistent with their own religious or philosophical convictions.

However, the CNDD-FDD had won the elections and had then started to persecute and eliminate all persons who had not supported them, including the applicant’s husband, as he knew its secrets and even held

They maintained the statements they had made before the notary. They also alleged that the prosecuting authorities had exerted pressure on them to change their statements.

In June 1994 they applied to the Greek administrative courts for an order requiring the Navy Mutual Fund to pay them a supplementary pension.

Thereupon H.M. and the applicant drove to another nearby town in the Netherlands, where they met E.G. at a hospital parking lot. They then loaded the drugs into the car of E.G. and drove away.

A number of witnesses were heard by the military public prosecutor; some of them gave their statements at their discharge/home addresses; in line with the conclusions of the military public prosecutor,

them] – in the court’s view, there is no reason to doubt that [L.R.] followed them to the door of their apartment building.

Since then they have been held in various penitentiary facilities in the Donetsk region, allegedly with very limited or no contact with the outside world.

Then they hit the second applicant with gun butts. The first and third applicants rushed into the courtyard and tried to protect the second applicant, but the servicemen started beating them as well.

They alleged that it had been impossible for them, in particular for the first applicant, to return to their house, given the fact that F.T. lived in the vicinity. 19.

They were provided with a one-room flat but submit that this was part of the social authorities' policy towards them in order to make them divorce.

of the local authority under this section is necessary in the interests of the welfare of the child, it shall be the duty of the local authority to receive the child into their care under this section

The applicant was woken up by two police officers who did not introduce themselves to him and did not explain the reasons for their arrival. They told him to get dressed and go with them.

In 1969, there were indications that the applicants’ father was beating their mother. Allegations later emerged that the father had inflicted physical abuse on the children during this period.

The applicants challenged this argument. They observed that their complaint was that they had been deprived of the enjoyment of their property for a considerable period.

In particular, the Court held that the fact that the majority of these boards' members were civil servants and that some of them sat on account of their experience in agronomy, forestry and agriculture

He then found her and Mr S. at the address of their domicile, and they confirmed that his son V. was alive and stated that they were his legal guardians.

The applicant did not point to any deficiency in those efforts. The Court concludes that there was a good reason for their absence from the trial and the admission of their pre-trial statements. 42.

They claimed that, after their arrest in Russia, Uzbek officials had told them that, if extradited, they would be tortured.