On 13 June 2000 the Administrative Court held that an oral hearing was manifestly unnecessary in the matter because both parties had submitted all the necessary information in writing.

In its decisions the Constitutional Court had held, in particular, that the relevant cantonal governments should identify the exact number of unenforced judgments and the amount of aggregate debt, and

In its decisions the Constitutional Court had held, in particular, that the relevant cantonal governments should identify the exact number of unenforced judgments and the amount of aggregate debt, and

  After the hearing the Court will begin its deliberations, which are held in private. Judgment will be delivered at a later date.

After the hearing the Court will begin its deliberations, which are held in private. The decision on admissibility will be delivered at a later date.

    After the hearing the Court will begin its deliberations, which are held in private. Judgment will be delivered at a later date.

In a judgment of 8 January 2009 , the Court held unanimously that there had been no violation of Article 5 § 3. On 5 June 2009 the case was referred to the Grand Chamber at the applicant’s request.

He relied on Article 6 § 1 (right to a determination of civil rights within a reasonable time) of the European Convention on Human Rights   The European Court of Human Rights held by six votes to

  After the hearing the Court will begin its deliberations, which are held in private. Judgment will be delivered at a later date.

    After the hearing the Court will begin its deliberations, which are held in private. Judgment will be delivered at a later date.

    ***     After the hearing the Court will begin its deliberations, which are held in private. Judgment will be delivered at a later date.

  In its Chamber judgment of 12 December 2006, the Court held, by four votes to three, that there had been no violation of Article 14 taken in conjunction with Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.

    ***   After the hearing the Court will begin its deliberations, which are held in private. Judgment will be delivered at a later date.

  After the hearing the Court will begin its deliberations, which are held in private. Judgment will be delivered at a later date.

  After the hearing the Court will begin its deliberations, which are held in private. Judgment will be delivered at a later date.

  After the hearing the Court will begin its deliberations, which are held in private. Judgment will be delivered at a later date.

  In its Chamber judgment of 10 November 2005 (press release 609 of 2005) the Court held, by five votes to two, that there had been no violation of Article 2 concerning the shooting by a police officer

  In its Chamber judgment of 25 April 2006 (press release No. 234 , 2006) the Court held, by four votes to three, that there had been a violation of Article 10 of the Convention.

It held that the refusal to grant the applicant authorisation had not been based on her choice of lifestyle and had not therefore given rise to a breach of Articles 8 (right to respect for private and