The decision became final because none of the parties appealed. D.     Civil proceedings 1.     Defamation proceedings 18.

    SUR LA VIOLATION ALLÉGUÉE DE L'ARTICLE 1 DU PROTOCOLE N o 1 14.

  INTRODUCTION   1.

  INTRODUCTION   (par. 1 - 6)                     1       II.

  INTRODUCTION   (par. 1 - 25)                   1     A.

in civil proceedings (Article 129 (1)) or if the court was not competent to examine it (Article   129   (7)).

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 1 OF PROTOCOL NO. 1 TO THE CONVENTION 34.

, 29(1) and 31(1) of the Mental Health Act 2001, Zakon o zaštiti osoba sa duševnim smetnjama , published in the Official Gazette of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina (“OG FBH”) no. 37/01 of 15 &

It ruled that no decision of a court could be based solely on information which constituted a State secret and which had not been disclosed to the parties to the case. In the ruling no.

(P1-1).

The judge did not grant my requests, everything happened very quickly. She [ [1] ] wanted to have me imprisoned. I did not request the removal of the judge.

    In its initial application the applicant also complained of a violation of its rights guaranteed under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention.

There is no information in the case file as to whether the prosecutor had been informed of the hearing and what the reasons for his non-attendance were.

The intelligence supporting the allegations was not disclosed to him and no criminal charges were brought against him.

His further detention could not therefore be said to have been effected with a view to his deportation as this was no longer feasible.

not be the only evidence on which a court based its decision.

Assize Court’s judgment (see Information Note no.

Non-violation de l'art. 6-1;Non-violation de l'art. 10

Non-violation de l'art. 6-1;Non-violation de l'art. 8