Ceci mènerait en général à la conclusion, inadmissible, que le successeur juridique dispose de plus de droits que son prédécesseur (principe nemo plus iuris ad alium transfere potest) .

mais une appréciation, un jugement d’inférence qui, partant, peut être révisé en cassation par la voie du paragraphe 1 de l’article 849 du code de procédure pénale en tant qu’éventuel «   error iuris

parties, the Polish Government, the Spanish Episcopal Conference and European Centre for Law and Justice (ECLJ), the Unione Giuristi Cattolici Italiani , the Observatory for Religious Freedom, Ordo Iuris

The Government claim, invoking the principle ignorantia iuris nocet , that they cannot be held responsible for the applicant’s lack of legal awareness.

non-gouvernementales suivantes   : l’Association pour le droit de mourir dans la dignité, Care   not   Killing , le Centre européen pour le droit et la justice, Dignitas , et l’Institut Ordo Iuris

gouvernement défendeur et celles communiquées en réplique par les requérants, les commentaires reçus du gouvernement slovaque, du Centre européen pour le droit et la justice (ECLJ) et de l’Institut Ordo Iuris

l’identité des requérants, les observations communiquées par le gouvernement défendeur et celles communiquées en réplique par les requérants, les commentaires adressés à la Cour par l’Institut Ordo Iuris

  58880/19; the comments submitted in respect of applications nos. 39769/17, 9167/18 and 48372/18 by the Government of the Czech Republic, the Government of the Slovak Republic and the Ordo Iuris

rendu par le tribunal judiciaire de Nice le 27 janvier 2022, que le tribunal de [Localité 6], par jugement du 28 décembre 2022, a rejeté cette demande de saisie conservatoire pour défaut de « fumus boni iuris

14) against the Republic of Moldova lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Moldovan national, Mr Iurii

’adopter toutes les mesures conservatoires nécessaires aux fins de l’arrêt définitif ou d’anticiper la décision sur les principaux griefs (art. 121 CPTA), à condition que les exigences de fumus boni iuris

archbishop, and also as Judicial Vicar ( Judizialvikar ), any such behaviour as alleged in the incriminated passages would not only be incompatible with the requirement of orthodoxy under the Codex Iuris

all conservative measures which are necessary with a view to the final judgment or to anticipate the final decision on the main claims (Article 121 CPTA), provided that the requirements of fumus boni iuris

Some consider it as a legal fiction ( fictio iuris ) that the legislature has provided for in order to [determine] the punishment ( quoad pooenam ) and for other effects, for example the determination

declare the remainder of the application inadmissible; the observations submitted by the respondent Government and the observations in reply submitted by the applicants; the comments submitted by the Ordo Iuris

application to the Romanian Government (“the Government”); the observations submitted by the respondent Government and the observations in reply submitted by the applicants; the comments submitted by Ordo Iuris

In that regard, he also referred to that judge’s past activities before being appointed, including co-founding and leading Ordo Iuris in Poland, a non ‑ governmental organisation which – according

; the decision not to disclose the applicants’ names; the observations submitted by the Government and the observations in reply submitted by the applicants; the comments submitted by Validity, ORDO IURIS

declare inadmissible the remainder of the application; the observations submitted by the Government and the observations submitted in reply by the applicant; the comments submitted by Article 19 and Ordo Iuris

  Iulis Moldovan alleges that on 20   September   1993, the three Roma men killed were lynched on his property.   His home and other property were set on fire and destroyed.