CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

146 résultats pour « Manoukian »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0205JUD002087507

Admin. suprême

5 février 2013

5 février 2013

Turkey (dec.), no. 10/10, 6 December 2011; Manukyan v. Georgia (dec.), no. 53073/07, 9 October 2012).

Page 7 sur 8

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0708JUD000116412

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 2021

8 juillet 2021

Mother - Pechora, Komi Republic   Civil partner - Syktyvkar, Komi Republic     2,800     3,500       6,000     18618/17 15/05/2017 Artur Aramaisovich MANUKYAN

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0122DEC003976806

Admin. suprême

22 janvier 2013

22 janvier 2013

applicant considered the available domestic remedies in the area of criminal justice to be ineffective, he should have applied to the Court within six months of the latest known domestic decision (see Manukyan

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0616JUD004016706

Admin. suprême

16 juin 2015

16 juin 2015

The officer in question is Colonel Manukyan of the “NKR” Defence Army.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0918JUD001599811

Admin. suprême

18 septembre 2025

18 septembre 2025

Harutyunyan, Ms Jemma Vardumyan, Mr Hovsep Khachatryan, Ms Alla Hovhannisyan, Mr Aram Khachatryan, Ms Lilya Minasyan, Ms Gayane Hovhannisyan, Mr   Edik Harutyunyan, Mr Sargis Kloyan, Ms Azatuhi Manukyan

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0506DEC003722911

Admin. suprême

6 mai 2014

6 mai 2014

Several detainees and opposition figures were released in November and December 2010 after serving half of their sentence or because they were eligible to be released on parole: Ashot Manukyan (1 November

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0326JUD004841916

Admin. suprême

26 mars 2026

26 mars 2026

They, however, left that important question unanswered, which in itself was a flaw serious enough to render the investigation ineffective (compare Manukyan v. Armenia [Committee], no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-144976

Admin. suprême

19 mai 2014

19 mai 2014

Manukyan v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0322DEC001776706

Admin. suprême

22 mars 2016

22 mars 2016

applicant of his own individual obligation to undertake elementary steps and seek information from the relevant authorities about the investigation’s progress or the lack thereof (see, for example, Manukyan

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-116764

Admin. suprême

22 janvier 2013

22 janvier 2013

Has the applicant exhausted the domestic remedies and complied with the six month requirement laid down in Article 35 § 1 in respect of his complaints under Articles 3 and 5 of the Convention (see Manukyan

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1117JUD002218210

Admin. suprême

17 novembre 2015

17 novembre 2015

  October 2010 did not warrant the interruption of the initial six-month period or revive the national authorities’ procedural obligation to investigate his allegations of ill-treatment (see Manukyan

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0616DEC002448813

Admin. suprême

16 juin 2015

16 juin 2015

applicant of his own individual obligation to undertake elementary steps and seek information from the relevant authorities about the investigation’s progress or the lack thereof (see, for example, Manukyan

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0326JUD001923418

Admin. suprême

26 mars 2026

26 mars 2026

In the Court’s view, leaving such important questions unanswered amounts in itself to a flaw serious enough to render the investigation ineffective (compare Manukyan v. Armenia [Committee], no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1119JUD007208012

Admin. suprême

19 novembre 2020

19 novembre 2020

cannot be said that she did not show an interest in having the relevant facts elucidated through a criminal investigation at the domestic level (contrast Akhvlediani and Others , cited above, § 25; Manukyan

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0206JUD004039410

Admin. suprême

6 février 2020

6 février 2020

cannot be said that she did not show an interest in having the relevant facts elucidated through a criminal investigation at the domestic level (contrast Akhvlediani and Others , cited above, § 25; Manukyan

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0221JUD000708811

Admin. suprême

21 février 2019

21 février 2019

    In this connection, the Court reiterates its findings in the cases of Manukian v. Georgia ((dec.) no   49448/08, §§ 33-35, 3 May 2016) and Parjiani v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0412JUD001206012

Admin. suprême

12 avril 2016

12 avril 2016

Romania (dec.), no. 27631/12, §   48, 52 and 53 6 May 2014, and Manukyan v. Georgia (dec.), no.   53073/07, § 33, 9   October 2012).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1116JUD002752409

Admin. suprême

16 novembre 2017

16 novembre 2017

Manukyan, a lawyer practising in Yerevan. The Armenian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr G.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0616JUD001321605

Admin. suprême

16 juin 2015

16 juin 2015

Moreover, Mr Vazgen Manukyan, Armenian Minister of Defence from 1992 to 1993, admitted in an interview with British journalist and writer, Thomas de Waal, in October 2000 that the public declarations stating

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1117DEC000414813

Admin. suprême

17 novembre 2016

17 novembre 2016

69689/13 29/10/2013 Tetyana Mykolayivna KOVALCHUK 30/09/1976 Gladkovychi Ukrainian Ovruch District Court of Zhytomyr Region, 08/10/2009 Not enforced   69974/13 28/10/2013 Andriy Anatoliyovych MANOYKIN

Source officielle