Türkiye 30/10/2019 İbrahim ÖZTÜRK 1984 Kocaeli Turkish   12. 58611/19 Aksu v. Türkiye 07/11/2019 Latif AKSU 1967 İzmir Turkish   13. 58781/19 Yılmaz v.

Türkiye 07/11/2022 İbrahim ALANCI 1980 Denizli Turkish Mehmet TUNÇER 34. 53312/22 Güngör v. Türkiye 07/11/2022 Murat GÜNGÖR 1990 Istanbul Turkish Mahir ORAK 35. 53321/22 Işık v.

Türkiye 19/10/2020 Ali KURT 1973 Sivas Turkish Tarık Said GÜLDİBİ 136. 48952/20 Emeç v. Türkiye 28/08/2020 Hüseyin EMEÇ 1988 Hatay Turkish   137. 48982/20 Kanak v.

Ibragim B. himself called Khasan Yusupov, who said that they were still waiting. There was no radio contact after that.

In the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on it, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the

In the event of failure to pay these sums within the said three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the

The Court also observed that the said order had not severely circumscribed his relationship with his daughter. In particular, he had suffered no restrictions on his custody and visiting rights.

  Türkiye 21/06/2019 Turgut YILDIZ 1984 Kocaeli Turkish İbrahim Halil UZUN 44. 36066/19 Apa v.

Türkiye 10/03/2020 İbrahim Gökhan KURT 1987 Malatya Turkish     15157/20 Çevik v. Türkiye 04/03/2020 Zeynal ÇEVİK 1986 Adıyaman Turkish     15695/20 Dural v.

İbrahim Yeşil took a statement from Behyettin El and Ahmet Gergin on 29 April 1992.

They are relatives of İbrahim Erdoğan, Yücel Şimşek, İbrahim Ilcı, Cavit Özkaya and Hasan Eliuygun, suspected members of Dev-Sol (“Revolutionary Left”), who were killed by the security forces in İstanbul

    On the same date Mr Ibragim Maskhudov was questioned as a witness.

Türkiye 13/11/2017 İbrahim KURT 12/10/1966 Yücel ALKAN High Court judge     84630/17 Çolak v.

Türkiye 27/05/2020 İbrahim ÖZEN 1983 Ağrı Turkish Timur DEMİR   22218/20 Tetik v. Türkiye 12/05/2020 Şinasi Sedat TETİK 1976 Ankara Turkish Burak ÇOLAK   23433/20 Büyükçakır v.

The lawyer, alleging that the police officers were recording phrases that had not been said by the applicant, also requested that the police officers remove that part of the applicant’s statement. 9.

Türkiye 01/10/2020 İbrahim AKPINAR 1987 Istanbul Turkish   67. 44742/20 Koç v. Türkiye 22/09/2020 Şükrü KOÇ 1988 Erzincan Turkish   68. 44773/20 Erkal v.

The applicant’s complaints under Articles 3 and 8 of the Convention, concerning his stay conditions in the said Centre, were communicated to the Italian Government (“the Government”), who submitted observations

The applicant’s complaints under Articles 3, 5 and 13 of the Convention concerning his conditions of stay in the said Hotspot were communicated to the Italian Government (“the Government”), who submitted

The applicant’s complaints under Articles 3 and 8 of the Convention, concerning his conditions of stay in the said centre, were communicated to the Italian Government (“the Government”), who submitted

His complaints under Articles 3, 5 and 13 of the Convention, concerning his conditions of stay in the said Hotspot, were communicated to the Italian Government (“the Government”), who submitted observations