On 16 October 2000 the applicant filed an objection with the Bingöl District Administrative Court ( Bölge İdare Mahkemesi ) against the decision of the Bingöl Provincial Administrative Council.

Nevertheless, this does not mean that each detainee must be guaranteed the same level of medical treatment that is available in the best health establishments outside prison facilities (see, for instance

Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by two British nationals, Mr Gerard O’Halloran and Mr Idris

xa0;    38549/07 28/08/2007 Ali ÖZDEMİR 15/09/1965 İstanbul   Doğan GÜR Assize Court K:2007/84             41884/07 12/09/2007 Mehmet İdris

    La requérante est représentée par M es   Sami et Duygu Erkan, avocats à Edirne. Le gouvernement turc («   le Gouvernement   ») est représenté par son agent. 3.

Türkiye 05/12/2018 Sami KARA 1964 Manisa Turkish Arife YÜKSEKDAĞ ALTUNAY Awarded 15. 58411/18 Eriktaş v.

   On 21 September 1990 Mr Kalaç asked the Supreme Administrative Court of the Armed Forces (Askeri Yüksek idare Mahkemesi) to set aside the order of 1 August 1990 and the measures ordered by

On the same day a resident of the neighbouring house at 8 Solnechnaya Street in Argun, Mr T.A., was abducted under similar circumstances.

On the same day the public prosecutor took statements from Hüsna, Halise and İhsan Acar, and the farmer İlhan Ezer. 22.

On the same day a crisis committee, set up by the Istanbul Governor's Office, also went to the site and found that the landslide had indeed been caused by a methane-gas explosion. 19.

Türkiye 18/08/2020 Sami DEMİR 1990 Ankara Turkish İrem GÜNEŞ 139. 37774/20 Öğe v. Türkiye 02/06/2020 İbrahim ÖĞE 1987 Adana Turkish Özcan AKINCI 140. 37964/20 Kanberoğlu v.

Türkiye 02/07/2020 Ahmet SARI 1968 Kütahya Turkish     30528/20 Benli v. Türkiye 04/06/2020 Esat Faruk BENLİ 1970 Konya Turkish Fatma Zehra BENLİ   30619/20 Fidan v.

On 14 November 1996 the Istanbul Provincial Administrative Council ( İl İdare Kurulu ) decided that the police officers A.K, B.M and A.Y should be prosecuted ( lüzum-u muhakemelerine ) pursuant to Article

Accordingly, it dismisses this objection on the same grounds. Objection based on non-compliance with the four-month time-limit 18 .     The Government contended that applications nos.

On the same day the members of a crisis unit set up by the Istanbul Governor’s Office also went to the site and found that the landslide had indeed been caused by a methane explosion. 20.

46935/18) against the Russian Federation lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Russian national, Mr Idris

These complaints are linked to the same proceedings which they complain about the excessive length. THE LAW I.

Türkiye 24/07/2019 İdris AKDEMİR 1985 Muş Turkish     41790/19 Barlık v. Türkiye 26/07/2019 Şahin BARLIK 1991 Manisa Turkish Arife YÜKSEKDAĞ ALTUNAY   41819/19 Gider v.

          On the same date, he also decided to authorise the filing of the applicant's letters of 16 and 22 January 1996, with their enclosures, but to refuse that