CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0912DEC002438215
12 septembre 2023
Inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae
CASELAW;CLIN;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:002-13411
7 septembre 2021
Inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies
ECLI:CEDH:002-13413
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0531DEC000138304
31 mai 2005
avoid } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .sB339B741 { width:155.08pt; display:inline-block } .sA6F0009D { width:191.63pt; display:inline-block } FOURTH SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0207DEC007474214
7 février 2017
Inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1117DEC000610707
17 novembre 2015
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-10855
5 janvier 2016
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0105DEC005632810
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0906DEC000030011
6 septembre 2016
  42442/08, § 20, 2 June 2016), the purpose of the new admissibility rule in Article 35 §3(b) is to enable more rapid disposal of unmeritorious cases and thus to allow the Court to concentrate on
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0321DEC004169806
21 mars 2017
ECLI:CEDH:002-11483
4 avril 2017
ECLI:CEDH:002-12665
5 novembre 2019
Firstly, the applicant had been fully involved in the EFTA Court proceedings and had had every opportunity to plead the admissibility of its application and to present that court with evidence to prove
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1008DEC003427519
8 octobre 2019
ECLI:CEDH:002-11183
5 juillet 2016
ECLI:CEDH:002-11979
15 mai 2018
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0515DEC004107916
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0515DEC000245116
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0515DEC004431212
ECLI:CEDH:002-11983
22 mai 2018
ECLI:CEDH:002-12203
16 octobre 2018
Page 7 sur 1885