Close: delivery of Court of Cassation's judgment. Result: about seven and a half years. B.

On an unspecified date the counter-claim was disjoined from the proceedings. 8.     On 30 April 2002 the court found against the applicant. 9.

registre du courrier départ pour la période de janvier 2015 à mars 2016 ; 3) le registre du courrier arrivé pour la période de janvier 2015 à mars 2016.

    On 9 August 2010 the Weiden District Court convicted the applicant of twenty-five counts of fraud in conjunction with twenty-two counts of forgery of data.

In the course of the new examination, the District Court refused to examine the applicants’ and Bit-Ost’s claim to the ship for the following reasons: “A prosecutor, [when] heard at a court hearing, stated

In 1997, upon referral from the municipal court, the Supreme Court dismissed the applicant's request, finding no indication of bias in respect of the first-instance court.

of the Belarusian court. 21.

As to the course of the proceedings following the Constitutional Court’s judgment, the Government submitted that the applicant was required to have recourse again to the Constitutional Court under Article

As regards the Assize Court’s refusal to take accept as evidence the opinion of a private expert the Supreme Court found that the applicant had failed to ask the court to appoint an expert.

  Decision of the Court   Article 3 of Protocol No. 1   The Court first noted the divergences in law and practice in the countries which had ratified the European Convention on Human Rights

The Turkish forces allowed counter-demonstrators and Turkish Cypriot police to cross a restricted military area and to enter the United Nations buffer zone.

By judgment of 10 March 2005 the Supreme Court ( Oberster Gerichtshof ) partly confirmed the Regional Court’s judgment. As regards some of the charges it remitted the case back to the Regional Court.

    On 21 March 2013, the Assize Court found the applicant guilty on five of the eight counts on the indictment, namely two counts of participating in a criminal organisation, two counts of participating

The courses which the applicant underwent were concluded within eight months of his recall and no further courses were arranged during the following sixteen months before his next review.

    The applicants and their co-defendants Mr Zakshevskiy, S.S. and   I.K. stood trial at the Donetsk Regional Court of Appeal, acting as a trial court (“the trial court”). 32.

demandées par les époux X ; 2) le courrier de l'Agence régionale de santé (ARS) adressé à Monsieur X courant août 2016, dont l'ARS fait état dans son courrier du 3 août 2016 ; 3) la réponse de la commune

    On 13 January 1995 the Gdańsk Regional Court pronounced its judgment. It convicted the applicant as indicted, except for the count of murder, of which he was acquitted.

(β) Before the Constitutional Court On 27 May 2003 the applicant appealed against the Civil Court’s judgment before the Constitutional Court.

In respect of the accused D. and S. the Federal Court only quashed the Regional Court's sentence.

    While the reasoning of trial or appellate courts’ decisions is subject to certain requirements, the Court is substantially more benevolent when assessing the reasons for a Supreme Court’s