The object of the request and of the applicant’s application was to obtain a decision as to whether the facts of the case disclosed a breach by the respondent State of its obligations under Article &#xa0

Selon l'arrêt attaqué (Nîmes, 14 octobre 2019), rendu sur renvoi après cassation (2e Civ., 8 juin 2017, pourvoi n° 16-20.616), Mme [Z], blessée dans un accident de la circulation survenu à l'

One bullet and five spent cartridges were collected from the scene. 53.

E... pour tenir la banque ; qu'en effet, suite à l'épisode du « Croc » et à la mise en circulation de chèques qui ne sont pas encaissables, la crédibilité de la partie de M.

    Holds by five votes to two that there has been no violation of Article 10 of the Convention.

He requested that the court find the inaction of the Feodosiya ITT authorities in this respect unlawful and to oblige it to remedy the situation. 27.

    On January 1997 a file was presented to the DPP. On 16 May 1997 the DPP gave a “no prosecution” direction. 23 .

    In the meantime, Mr Byrski, the child’s biological father, had applied to the Dublin Circuit Family Court for recognition of his rights over the child.

him to a fine of 20,000 Russian roubles (RUB), (about 495 euros (EUR) at the time).

On 07/05/2018 at the court the applicant was informed that there was no information/case file concerning either of his cases. His visit was duly registered in the court’s records.

On the same day he was examined by the prison doctor, who noted that his breathing and circulation were fine. His blood pressure was 145/80 and he had a heart rate of 70. 12 .

Toutefois, en raison du manque de place au refuge des sans-abri du Pirée, les requérants furent obligés de vivre en plein air, place Attikis, à Athènes. C.

not exceeding 200,000 francs. (2) If the person concerned acts in his professional capacity, he or she shall be liable to a term of imprisonment not exceeding five years and to a fine not exceeding 500,000

    The applicants and the Government each filed observations on the merits (Rule 59 § 1). 8.

    The relevant provisions of the Prevention of Terrorism Act 1991 read as follows: Section 6 “It shall be an offence, punishable by a fine of from five million to ten million Turkish liras,

He was disarmingly genuine, vivid and figurative in his descriptions, which he gave in a simple and unpretentious manner ...

    The investigator noted the presence in the case file of the written confession drawn up by Mr Lykov shortly before his death. 25.

] représentée par Maître William FUMEY de la SELARL ROINÉ ET ASSOCIES, avocats au barreau de PARIS plaidant DEFENDERESSES EXPOSE DU LITIGE Monsieur [P] [S] a été victime d’un accident de la circulation

    The applicant and the Government each filed observations on the merits (Rule 59 § 1).

    The principle of area-wide hunting was a central element of the obligation to preserve wildlife.