Benthem (cf. Eur.

In any event the applicants’ claim in the present case went well beyond the mere question of passing a qualifying examination.

LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE COMMERCIALE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Joint les pourvois n° H 13-25. 312 et S 13-26. 586, qui attaquent le même arrêt ; Attendu, selon l'arrêt attaqué, que les sociétés

Court H.R., Benthem judgment of 23 October 1985, Series A no. 97).

The claim or dispute must also be "genuine and of a serious nature" (see e.g.   Eur. Court H.R., Benthem judgment of 23 October 1985, Series A no. 97, p. 14, para. 32).

   The respondent Government submit that the applicants have not put forward any "arguable claims" as established in the Convention organs' case-law (see Eur. Court H.R., Boyle and Rice v.

  However, according to its case-law the applicant company could no longer claim a practical interest in its public law appeal since the Cantonal Pharmacy with its letter of 20 June 1988 had again

    In the applicants’ view, the case had not been of a complex nature.

  It may suffice to refer to the Court's reasoning in the Benthem case (Eur. Court H.R., Benthem judgment of 23 October 1985, Series A no. 97).

  As to the existence of a "contestation" (dispute) over a right, the Court would refer to the principles enunciated in its case-law and summarised in its Benthem judgment of 23 October 1985 (Series

       The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows:     Particular circumstances of the case        By

of cases to rapporteurs.

In the case of Ahtinen v.

    On 1 April 2006 this case was assigned to the newly constituted Fifth Section (Rule 25 § 5 and Rule 52 § 1). THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 6.

Cette disposition doit être rappelée par un affichage clair et visible dans les lieux dans lesquels ce droit s'exerce.

    The circumstances of the case 1.     Background to the case The applicant was the mayor of Noisy-le-Grand (Seine-Saint-Denis) for ten years.

       The facts of the case, as they have been submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows.   A.

Par des mémoires en défense, enregistrés les 12 juin 2025 et 8 septembre 2025, la commune de Bouc-Bel-Air, représentée par la SCP Lesage Berguet Gouard-Robert, conclut au rejet de la requête et à ce qu'il

In the case of Sabeva v.