judgment of 08/07/2004, final on 08/10/2004 56793/00   Babichkin, judgment of 10/08/2006, final on 10/11/2006 28583/03   Bratovanov, judgment of 23/04/2009, final on 23/07/2009 27918/02   Demirevi

    Application no. 24708/09, Debizova and Others v.

Court considers that the rights and freedoms relied upon by the applicants concern them individually and are not attributable to the Parliament of Catalonia as an institution (see, to converse effect, Demirbas

The Court next observes that the decision of the police to give the wire to Company E. could in principle be considered to have operated in the general interest of combating criminal activities (see Denisova

BELOTSERKOVETS 03/07/2008 01/12/2008 24620/02 BELYAYEV 25/01/2007 25/04/2007 72558/01 BLAGOVESTNYY 04/07/2006 04/10/2006 1719/02 BUTSEV 22/09/2005 15/02/2006 40642/02 DENISENKOV 22/09/2005 15/02/2006 34431/04 DENISOVA

substantially the   same, involving, as they do, the legitimacy of the aim of any interference, as well as its proportionality and the preservation of a fair balance (see, mutatis   mutandis , Denisova

The purpose of fighting crime undoubtedly falls within the general interest as envisaged in Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (see Denisova and Moiseyeva v. Russia , no. 16903/03, § 58, 1 April 2010). 100.

       (3)   Incident report dated 8 April 1993 by           Gendarmerie Officers Gürsel Demirtas, Tayfur Nur    

  22451/20* 28/04/2020 Stepan Nikolayevich DEMIDOV 1985     van, numerous occasions of transport between the detention facility and the courthouse since 03/06/2019 and still pending at the

suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Restriction of access to the investigation file Lack of hearing during the detention review 34 47603/18 Demiroz

BELOTSERKOVETS 03/07/2008 01/12/2008 24620/02 BELYAYEV 25/01/2007 25/04/2007 72558/01 BLAGOVESTNYY 04/07/2006 04/10/2006 1719/02 BUTSEV 22/09/2005 15/02/2006 40642/02 DENISENKOV 22/09/2005 15/02/2006 34431/04 DENISOVA