The applicant claimed 34,000,000,000 Turkish liras (TRL), in respect of pecuniary damage and TRL 15,000,000,000 in respect of non-pecuniary damage. 45.

    The applicant claimed 65,000 new Turkish liras (YTL) (approximately 40,236 euros (EUR)) in respect of pecuniary and YTL   40,000 (approximately EUR 24,760) for non-pecuniary damage.

Par ailleurs, la nature «   civile   » de ce droit ne fait pas de doute, l’état des personnes relevant des droits de caractère civil au sens de l’article 6 § 1 ( Lassauzet et Guillot c. la France

DE GUILLEC [Adresse 33] 29440 PLOUZEVEDE N'ayant pas constitué avocat INDIVISION [M] [I] [Adresse 33] 29440 PLOUZEVEDE N'ayant pas constitué avocat Société JOHN DEERE FINANCIAL [Adresse

COMPOSITION DE LA COUR LORS DES DÉBATS ET DU DÉLIBÉRÉ : Président : Monsieur Hervé BALLEREAU, Président de chambre, Assesseur : Madame Isabelle CHARPENTIER, Conseillère, Assesseur : Monsieur Bruno GUINET

"les investigations accomplies ont en effet permis de déterminer que le courrier avait été rédigé non pas sur une feuille provenant d'une liasse mais sur une feuille simple comportant le nouveau logo de

    On 12 April 1988 the Military Court of Cassation quashed the judgment of the first instance court on the ground that the latter failed to establish the guilt of the applicant in some of the

The applicant was accused of ordering or not preventing the unauthorized arrests, torture and killings of civilians in Zagreb, Kutina, Ribnjak, Janja Lipa, Bujavica, Međuriče, Zbjegovača and Pakračka Poljana

In this connection, they noted that the proceedings against the applicant were not of an individual nature but of a collective one since they had concerned the establishment of guilt of members of a terrorist

The Court acknowledges, in the first place, the seriousness of the offence with which the applicant was charged and the severity of the sanction which he faced if found guilty.

The reasonable suspicion referred to in Article   5   §   1   (c) of the Convention does not mean that the suspected person’s guilt must at that stage be established.

  The first number is the case's position on the list of cases referred to the Court in the relevant year (second number).

suivant : Sur le pourvoi formé par Mlle Corinne Y..., demeurant ..., en cassation d'un arrêt rendu le 19 février 1998 par la cour d'appel d'Amiens (5e Chambre sociale), au profit de la société Guilbert

In establishing his guilt, the trial court stated that he had been apprehended as he had been attempting to cross into Syria and concluded that he was a member of the PYD/YPG after simply recapitulating

Although, in general, the expression “the state of the evidence” may be a relevant factor for the existence and persistence of serious indications of guilt, nevertheless, taken alone in the present case

    The applicant claimed 100,000 new Turkish liras (YTL) in respect of pecuniary and YTL 50,000 of non-pecuniary damage. 54.     The Government disputed these claims. 55.

    The Court considers that, in general, the expression “the state of the evidence” may be a relevant factor for the existence and persistence of serious indications of guilt.

In the report, under the heading “Records of Guilt” ( Suçluluk Kayıtları ), were two entries concerning the applicant which read as follows: “1- Member of Dev-Yol, 14/03/1990, Political Offences Branch

en référé délivrée à la requête de : DEMANDEUR FONDS DE GARANTIE DES ASSURANCES OBLIGATOIRES DE DOMMAGES [Adresse 1] [Localité 1] Représenté par Me Marion LAROUDIE collaboratrice de Me Lisa