savoir s'il avait été renouvelé, et la réponse adressée selon mail du 10 janvier 2022 à 12h26 du CCPD du Perthus indiquant 'en réponse à votre demande et après recherche auprès du détachement espagnol policia

l'ensemble immobilier [Adresse 1] situé [Localité 1] représenté par son syndic l'agence C/ [H] Le : 09 Avril 2026 Copie exécutoire et copie à : la SELARL GUMUSCHIAN ROGUET BONZY POLZELLA

N° RG 24/01183 - N° Portalis DBVM-V-B7I-MFWZ N° Minute : C1 Copie exécutoire délivrée le : à la SELARL GUMUSCHIAN ROGUET BONZY POLZELLA

Helmi Poikela, wished to take over the application on his behalf.

During this time, the applicant allegedly could not leave the police’s bureau, not even for the toilet.

    The applicant further claims that the expert who translated the recordings obtained by the phone tapping and listening devices was a policeman and thus could not be considered impartial.

He further stated that a number of victims had already identified the criminal and that it was, therefore, to be ruled out that the policeman could have shot the wrong person.

The right to obtain accommodation shall be reserved for the family of the deceased policeman. This accommodation shall be granted within three months to that family as a matter of priority.

xa0; Since, according to Section 447 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the offence in question could be tried summarily, the same day the applicant was charged with this offence and questioned by a policeman

postulant ET : DEFENDERESSE A LA SAISINE Madame [K] [Q] née le 15 Juin 1962 à [Localité 3] de nationalité Française [Adresse 2] [Localité 4] représentée, concluant et plaidant par Me Anne POLICELLA

FIFTH SECTION Application no. 6855/15 Artur Sarkisovych ANTONYAN against Ukraine lodged on 20 January 2015 communicated on 18 September 2024 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the police’s

SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the authorities’ failure to inform the applicant of the proceedings before the Supreme Court relating to the annulment of the Tirana Construction Police’s

    On 26 August 2024 the applicants submitted a request for a review of the police’s decision by the supervising Prague 1 District Prosecutor (“the district prosecutor”).

While being transported in a police vehicle from Rveli to the police station in Borjomi, the applicant was allegedly subjected to verbal abuse and beating by the policeman; the beating and verbal abuse

The case concerns the killing of the applicants’ relatives, Kuncho Angelov and Kiril Petkov, by a military policeman who was trying to arrest them.

33797/17 and 37679/17 Dubravko GLAVAŠIĆ against Croatia and Željko TANKOSIĆ against Croatia lodged on 28 April 2017 and 17 May 2017 respectively SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASES The first applicant was a policeman

The policeman was subsequently indicted on charges of forcing somebody to prostitution, as an aggravated offence of organising prostitution.

On 16 October 2012 the applicant had imported 2,510.4 grams of cocaine and 55.4 grams of cannabis resin and delivered the cocaine to the same undercover policeman.

case mainly concerns the applicant’s complaints under Article   6   §   1 and Article 13 of the Convention regarding the domestic courts’ refusal to examine his claims challenging the police’s