CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

927 résultats pour « Privitello »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0316DEC000503307

Admin. suprême

16 mars 2010

16 mars 2010

In 2001 the State-owned company T., the applicant’s former employer, became a privately owned legal entity.

Source officielle

Page 8 sur 47

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-68187-68655

Admin. suprême

14 décembre 1999

14 décembre 1999

Italy, Privitera v. Italy, Muso v. Italy, Di Rosa v. Italy, F. v. Italy, Masi v. Italy, Iadanza v. Italy, and Ercolino et al. v. Italy.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-116561

Admin. suprême

14 janvier 2013

14 janvier 2013

in force at the time of the interference (December 2009); in any event, the provisions of that Code were misapplied, as most of those provisions concerned “State-owned and public housing” and not privately-owned

Source officielle
CA

6ème Chambre

6274bcc12799a9057d5dd12e

Appel

5 mai 2022

5 mai 2022

de la SCP CROCHET-DIMIER, avocat au barreau de SAINT-ETIENNE INTIMEE : LA SOCIETE DEMENAGEMENTS HENRI BRESSON 135 avenue Pierre Sémard 84000 AVIGNON Représentée par Me Anne BARLATIER PRIVITELLO

Source officielle
CA

8ème chambre

67f755c2d8218d22f82bd464

Appel

9 avril 2025

9 avril 2025

Adresse 2] [Localité 4] (bénéficie d'une aide juridictionnelle totale numéro 2022/019517 du 17/11/2022 accordée par le bureau d'aide juridictionnelle de Lyon) Représentée par Me Anne BARLATIER PRIVITELLO

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0205DEC001096804

Admin. suprême

5 février 2013

5 février 2013

    Furthermore, in the aftermath of the SFRY’s dissolution, a number of privately owned “pyramid scheme” banks were opened in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, including the Dafiment Bank

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-1457

Admin. suprême

25 juin 2009

25 juin 2009

case, only B.B. had been prosecuted by the competent State Attorney’s Office, and then only after it had initially refused to prosecute on the erroneous ground that the act could only be prosecuted privately

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-5474

Admin. suprême

6 décembre 2001

6 décembre 2001

proceedings Article 6-1 Access to court Applicants estopped from bringing claim to obtain compensation for expropriation at late stage of lengthy proceedings: violation Facts : In 1925 the State occupied a privately-owned

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-115908

Admin. suprême

12 décembre 2012

12 décembre 2012

He objected to the accusations, stating that he had been privately asked to bring some alcohol and had not received money for it.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0112JUD003753713

Admin. suprême

12 janvier 2016

12 janvier 2016

In 2011 three cases were decided by the Constitutional Court (in similar yet never identical formations of three judges), namely The Police vs Alvin Privitera of 11   April 2011, The   Police

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0417JUD002266809

Admin. suprême

17 avril 2012

17 avril 2012

be made in a manner compatible with effective access to the highest administrative court and which ensured equal treatment for parties represented by lawyers appointed under legal aid scheme and by privately

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1012DEC001674303

Admin. suprême

12 octobre 2004

12 octobre 2004

that where a person is brought to a police station under arrest, or is arrested at the police station after having attended voluntarily, the custody officer must inform him of the right to consult privately

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-159708

Admin. suprême

3 décembre 2015

3 décembre 2015

It found that the previous dispute concerned occupancy of a dormitory, while the present one concerned eviction from a privately owned apartment, the right of occupancy of which was governed, in particular

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1011438-1045665

Admin. suprême

27 mai 2004

27 mai 2004

complained, in particular, that he was not given the opportunity to challenge in court the allegations made against him which were the basis for his family’s eviction and that – unlike the owners of privately

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1270399-1327925

Admin. suprême

22 février 2005

22 février 2005

The house was taken under state management after the entering into force, on 13 February 1946, of a decree giving the Polish authorities power to assign flats in privately-owned buildings to particular

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-154428

Admin. suprême

17 avril 2015

17 avril 2015

It abolished the legal concept of the specially protected tenancy and provided that the holders of such tenancies in respect of, inter alia , privately owned flats were to become “protected lessees” (

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-2227

Admin. suprême

28 avril 2008

28 avril 2008

Under the former communist regime in Poland the State was given wide powers to administer properties and allocate housing, including power to grant residential leases over privately owned property.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-4799

Admin. suprême

18 février 1999

18 février 1999

It also observed that a decision not to extend the protection of the 1983 Law to Government tenants living side-by-side with tenants in privately-owned dwellings in a regulated area requires specific justification

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-104389

Admin. suprême

10 mars 2011

10 mars 2011

  General measures   Following modifications of the Criminal Code introduced in 2000, insult may now only be prosecuted privately (§§30 and 50 of the judgment) and imprisonment may no longer

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-202681

Admin. suprême

16 avril 2020

16 avril 2020

Was the applicant able to confer privately with counsel during the trial (see Yaroslav Belousov, cited above, §§   151-53, and Khodorkovskiy and Lebedev v.   Russia , nos.

Source officielle