CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1121DEC006643313
21 novembre 2017
If they had each separately claimed compensation for length of proceedings, they would also each separately have been awarded an amount of compensation comparable to that received by the applicant association
Page 8 sur 75
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0528JUD000111510
28 mai 2019
The Government considered that amount to be excessive. 44.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1011DEC004644799
11 octobre 2001
The price thus determined shall be reduced by the amortisation of the apartment, but not more than 50% of the total amount of amortisation.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0224JUD004388302
24 février 2005
The Government consider that the amounts claimed are unreasonable and unsubstantiated.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1106DEC003597202
6 novembre 2006
The applicants did not contest the fact that they had been paid the compensation amounts, referred to by the Government.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1113DEC003621919
13 novembre 2025
The legal provision contained in the third sentence of Article 92 of the Constitution was directly and immediately applicable. 10. The Government further referred to Guravska v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0907DEC005059813
7 septembre 2021
There was no reason of public interest to justify requiring the applicant company to pay tax amounting to two-thirds of its annual tax bill because it had had its securities revalued in order to comply
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0703DEC002629102
3 juillet 2007
They further maintained that the applicant had not challenged the alleged inactivity of the Bailiffs’ Service and had not claimed relevant compensation before the domestic courts.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0422DEC007401912
22 avril 2021
They stressed in that connection that the full amount of the debt had indeed been paid to the applicants, albeit with a delay.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0402JUD005499110
2 avril 2020
It said that they had failed to show that there had been special circumstances justifying the extremely high quantum of their claims.
chambre 1-12
69d39737cdc6046d474a49b3
7 juillet 2025
Attendu que le tribunal relève que ; * Les factures entrant dans le calcul de l'indemnité de résiliation incluent un coût de prestations et un coût d'amortissement des vêtements ; * La partie non amortie
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1121JUD000576911
Submitting examples of similar and successful claims yielding compensation awards, they explained that there was established case-law in this field, in accordance with which the courts’ tort liability
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0825DEC006165600
25 août 2005
The contested decisions constituted a miscarriage of justice since they had granted substantial compensation involving millions of zlotys without there being any legal or factual basis therefor.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:001-121970
29 mai 2013
64890/01, judgment [GC] of 29 March 2006) that the Court would not regard as manifestly unreasonable amounts of approximately 45% of the amounts that the Court itself awards in such cases
2ème chambre
DTA_2302568_20240423
23 avril 2024
Thierry Bataillard, rapporteur public. Considérant ce qui suit : 1. M.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0916DEC002466902
16 septembre 2004
The outstanding amount of the debt remained RUR 87,445. B.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1216DEC002943902
16 décembre 2003
It is incumbent on the Government claiming non-exhaustion to satisfy the Court that the remedy was an effective one, available in theory and in practice at the relevant time (see Khokhlich v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0630JUD000016517
30 juin 2020
The applicants complained that that they were still victims of the violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 upheld by the Constitutional Court given the low amount of compensation
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1020JUD005744419
20 octobre 2022
On 29 July 2011 a third expert report was commissioned at the request by the prosecution since they considered that the second report was contradictory.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0325JUD001401319
25 mars 2021
The third party rented the property under title of sub ‑ emphyteusis to another third party, who did the same.