CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

1 491 résultats pour « Thierry AMOURET »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1121DEC006643313

Admin. suprême

21 novembre 2017

21 novembre 2017

If they had each separately claimed compensation for length of proceedings, they would also each separately have been awarded an amount of compensation comparable to that received by the applicant association

Page 8 sur 75

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0528JUD000111510

Admin. suprême

28 mai 2019

28 mai 2019

    The Government considered that amount to be excessive. 44.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1011DEC004644799

Admin. suprême

11 octobre 2001

11 octobre 2001

The price thus determined shall be reduced by the amortisation of the apartment, but not more than 50% of the total amount of amortisation.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0224JUD004388302

Admin. suprême

24 février 2005

24 février 2005

    The Government consider that the amounts claimed are unreasonable and unsubstantiated.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1106DEC003597202

Admin. suprême

6 novembre 2006

6 novembre 2006

The applicants did not contest the fact that they had been paid the compensation amounts, referred to by the Government.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1113DEC003621919

Admin. suprême

13 novembre 2025

13 novembre 2025

The legal provision contained in the third sentence of Article   92 of the Constitution was directly and immediately applicable. 10.     The Government further referred to Guravska v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0907DEC005059813

Admin. suprême

7 septembre 2021

7 septembre 2021

There was no reason of public interest to justify requiring the applicant company to pay tax amounting to two-thirds of its annual tax bill because it had had its securities revalued in order to comply

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0703DEC002629102

Admin. suprême

3 juillet 2007

3 juillet 2007

They further maintained that the applicant had not challenged the alleged inactivity of the Bailiffs’ Service and had not claimed relevant compensation before the domestic courts.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0422DEC007401912

Admin. suprême

22 avril 2021

22 avril 2021

They stressed in that connection that the full amount of the debt had indeed been paid to the applicants, albeit with a delay.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0402JUD005499110

Admin. suprême

2 avril 2020

2 avril 2020

It said that they had failed to show that there had been special circumstances justifying the extremely high quantum of their claims.

Source officielle
TCOM

chambre 1-12

69d39737cdc6046d474a49b3

Commerce

7 juillet 2025

7 juillet 2025

Attendu que le tribunal relève que ; * Les factures entrant dans le calcul de l'indemnité de résiliation incluent un coût de prestations et un coût d'amortissement des vêtements ; * La partie non amortie

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1121JUD000576911

Admin. suprême

21 novembre 2017

21 novembre 2017

Submitting examples of similar and successful claims yielding compensation awards, they explained that there was established case-law in this field, in accordance with which the courts’ tort liability

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0825DEC006165600

Admin. suprême

25 août 2005

25 août 2005

The contested decisions constituted a miscarriage of justice since they had granted substantial compensation involving millions of zlotys without there being any legal or factual basis therefor.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CEDH:001-121970

Admin. suprême

29 mai 2013

29 mai 2013

  64890/01, judgment [GC] of 29   March 2006) that the Court would not regard as manifestly unreasonable amounts of approximately 45% of the amounts that the Court itself awards in such cases

Source officielle
TA

2ème chambre

DTA_2302568_20240423

Administratif

23 avril 2024

23 avril 2024

Thierry Bataillard, rapporteur public. Considérant ce qui suit : 1. M.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0916DEC002466902

Admin. suprême

16 septembre 2004

16 septembre 2004

The outstanding amount of the debt remained RUR 87,445.       B.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1216DEC002943902

Admin. suprême

16 décembre 2003

16 décembre 2003

It is incumbent on the Government claiming non-exhaustion to satisfy the Court that the remedy was an effective one, available in theory and in practice at the relevant time (see Khokhlich v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0630JUD000016517

Admin. suprême

30 juin 2020

30 juin 2020

    The applicants complained that that they were still victims of the violation of Article   1 of Protocol No. 1 upheld by the Constitutional Court given the low amount of compensation

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1020JUD005744419

Admin. suprême

20 octobre 2022

20 octobre 2022

On 29 July 2011 a third expert report was commissioned at the request by the prosecution since they considered that the second report was contradictory.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0325JUD001401319

Admin. suprême

25 mars 2021

25 mars 2021

The third party rented the property under title of sub ‑ emphyteusis to another third party, who did the same.

Source officielle