CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CJUE
ECLI:EU:C:1980:44
14 février 1980
Sentenza della Corte (Terza Sezione) del 14 febbraio 1980.#Office national des pensions des travailleurs salariés (ONPTS) contro Fioravante Damiani.
ECLI:EU:C:1987:181
7 avril 1987
Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 7 avril 1987.#Procédure pénale contre Italo Bullo et Francesco Bonivento.#Demande de décision préjudicielle: Corte d'appello di Venezia - Italie.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0623JUD002002404
23 juin 2011
Accordingly, the Court of Appeal amended the Regional Court’s reasoning in that regard. 4. Judgment of the Supreme Court of Cassation 21.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-10056
28 août 1991
of the court expert supports the prosecution case.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0601DEC005908900
1 juin 2004
In the course of subsequent review proceedings, the Supreme Court quashed the Regional Court's decision on 16 January 1996 and remitted the case to the latter court.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0411JUD001249821
11 avril 2024
On 14   July 2020 the Zaporizhzhya Court of Appeal (the appellate court) granted the applicant’s appeal and quashed the first-instance court’s judgment.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1130JUD004024019
30 novembre 2021
    By a District Court judgment of 7 October 2013, the applicant was convicted of one count for having tried to free a detainee in August 2012, and another count for having, in February 2013
ECLI:EU:C:1982:378
28 octobre 1982
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 28 October 1982.#Administrateur des Affaires Maritimes, Bayonne and Procureur de la République v José Dorca Marina and others.
comm
6137246ecd58014677415716
19 avril 2005
courtier de l'assureur, du 15 novembre 1991, la banque a été avisée de ce que M.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0129DEC004047822
29 janvier 2026
Moreover, the Constitutional Court reviewed and endorsed the District Court’s assessment of the proportionality of the freezing order within the applicable statutory parameters, taking into account the
Avis
CADA:20221007
31 mars 2022
Maître X, conseil de la SARL X, a saisi la Commission d'accès aux documents administratifs, par courrier enregistré à son secrétariat le 18 février 2022, à la suite du refus opposé par le directeur général
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0309DEC003657097
9 mars 1999
  The District Court further held that it was not bound by the opinion expressed in the Regional Court's judgment of 4 September 1990.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1014JUD001647403
14 octobre 2010
The Supreme Court's decision was communicated to the applicant on 25 October 2002. C.     The application to the Court 18.
civ3
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2026:C300011
8 janvier 2026
le 11 janvier 2024 par la cour d'appel de Montpellier (3e chambre), dans le litige l'opposant : 1°/ à Mme [W] [V], domiciliée [Adresse 3], 2°/ à M.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1120DEC003500309
20 novembre 2012
In 2006 he was charged with four counts of fraud and one count of misappropriation of private property.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-237924
9 octobre 2024
The Constitutional Court’s decision was served on the applicant on 28   November 2022.
ECLI:CEDH:001-171239
18 janvier 2017
    See Supreme Court judgment of 13 March 2014 (STS no. 186/2014). [2] .
ECLI:CEDH:002-7270
23 octobre 2012
As a result of their choice to reside in other European Union countries the applicants were entitled in their respective countries of residence to health care under the same regime as the local population
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0204DEC000572309
4 février 2020
Russian     Victor Leonidovich RASLIN   Gagarinskiy District Court of Moscow 26/07/2013   Moscow City Court 03/10/2013   Convicted of two counts of attempted fraud and one count
ECLI:CEDH:002-12943
6 octobre 2020
In April 2015 the District Court acquitted him on all charges.
Page 85 sur 36913
BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.