Judgment of the Court of 18 March 1975.#Marie-Louise Acton and Others v European Commission.#Joined Cases C-44/74, C-46/74 and C-49/74.

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 1.

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. 1.

It appears that only at that time could the applicant have learned that the PKU test in T.’s case had not been carried out within the required time-limit. On 9 June 2010 the diagnosis was confirmed.

    On 7   December 2017 the search of the applicant’s flat was carried out.

In the case of Pīlāgs v.

In the case of Abdullayev v.

    Procedure and composition of the Court   The case originated in two applications lodged with the European Court of Human Rights in February and March 2000.

     The search can be carried out in the absence of public officials,      members of the household or relatives in cases of imminent danger    &

  In the case of Atça and Çelebi v.

In the case of Archip v.

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 11 March 2026.#MAX magazín s. r. o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.

I... et la société Casino a pris fin le 30 septembre 2015 en raison de son départ à la retraite ; que par lettre du 13 mars 2017, la société Casino a résilié le contrat de Mme Y... pour inaptitude et impossibilité

No review was carried out at this time.

No review was carried out at this time.

    The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 5.

   The applicant claims that her arrest and detention on 19 March 1989 were carried out by Turkish military forces stationed in the northern part of Cyprus or by forces acting under their authority

The security forces carried out a follow-up operation in pursuit of the PKK who had attacked the station.

  In the case of Gaysanova v.