In the context of a criminal trial, the admissibility of evidence is a matter for regulation by national law and the national courts and the Court’s only concern is to examine whether the

On 22 June 2007 the Supreme Court dismissed an   interlocutory appeal by the applicant. 13.     On 14 September 2007 the applicant was charged with two other counts of extortion. 14 .

LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE SOCIALE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le moyen unique : Vu les articles 463 et 528, alinéa 1er, du code de procédure civile ; Attendu qu'il résulte du premier de ces

Adresse 3] représentés par Me Agnes ERMENEUX-CHAMPLY de la SCP ERMENEUX-CHAMPLY - LEVAIQUE, avocat au barreau d'AIX-EN-PROVENCE, Me Christian GIRARD, avocat au barreau de TOULON substitué par Me Rachel COURT-MENIGOZ

    In the course of the proceedings concerning the title to two garage-boxes the respondent company introduced a counter-claim, alleging that the applicant’s claims had been already met, as

preliminary objections) - 12806/87 Judgment 26.10.1993 Article 35 Article 35-3 Ratione temporis Criminal trial in accused's absence: preliminary objection allowed [This summary is extracted from the Court’s

1993 Darnell v. the United Kingdom - 15058/89 Judgment 26.10.1993 Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6-1 Reasonable time Length of civil proceedings: violation [This summary is extracted from the Court’s

In 1992, the Principal State Counsel at the Court of Cassation asked the Turkish Constitutional Court to dissolve the HEP.

       The request was rejected by the trial court's president and an appeal against this decision was dismissed by the Koblenz Court of Appeal (Oberlandesgericht) on 9 December

As regards, finally, the sixth ground, the court considered that enough evidence existed to justify putting count four to the jury.

The sentence of the court is that so far as the count of buggery is concerned, that is the eighth count on the indictment, you will go to prison for life.

On 24 October 2001 the Vienna Court of Appeal ( Oberlandesgericht ) dismissed the applicant’s appeal. It held that the Labour and Social Court had correctly applied the law.

de Cassation a, par arrêt du 15 janvier 1992, cassé un arrêt de la cour d'appel d'Orléans, du 14 mars 1990 et a renvoyé les parties devant la cour d'appel de Rouen ; que la juridiction de renvoi a

The first-instance court convicted the applicant of having committed the offence of embezzlement “between 2 and 4 February 2008”, whereas the Court of Appeal found proven that he had committed that offence

Court having relied on evidence which could not be tested before it.

Until 14 February 2012 the courts delivered eight judgments against the applicant, i.e.: -   the Łódź District Court’s judgment of 2 August 2007; -   the Łódź Regional Court judgment of 12 March

against four other counter-demonstrators, including a clergyman. 40.

A... a eu connaissance de la première date de consolidation ; que de fait, un courrier de sa part au courtier N...

The Senate upheld and expanded the reasoning contained in the decisions of the lower courts, relying on the Constitutional Court’s judgment of 23 April 2003 (see paragraph 28 below). 17.

The Court of Appeal upheld the public prosecutor’s request. In its decision, it referred to the counter-terrorism legislation and the prohibition of support for terrorism-related activities.