CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

2 001 résultats pour « Quiene »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0909REP002804895

Admin. suprême

9 septembre 1998

9 septembre 1998

Court HR, Quinn v. France judgment of 22 March 1995, Series A no. 311, p. 18, para. 47).   50.

Page 87 sur 101

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0408JUD003854497

Admin. suprême

8 avril 2004

8 avril 2004

  20, § 39 and Quinn v.   Ireland , no. 36887/97, §§ 43-46, 21 December 2000, unreported; see also, mutatis mutandis , Heaney and McGuinness , cited above, §§ 43-46). 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0526DEC004509704

Admin. suprême

26 mai 2005

26 mai 2005

stressed that these circumstances must be given a narrow interpretation having regard to the fact that they constitute exceptions to a most basic guarantee of individual freedom (see, mutatis mutandis , Quinn

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0423REP002836995

Admin. suprême

23 avril 1999

23 avril 1999

Furthermore, on 3 November 1992, she requested Her Majesty the Queen to grant letters of legitimation ( brieven van wettiging ) in respect of the child she was carrying.   19.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0605JUD002852303

Admin. suprême

5 juin 2012

5 juin 2012

It does not therefore apply to detention with a view to extradition within the meaning of Article 5 § 1 (f) (see Quinn v.   France , 22 March 1995, § 53, Series A no. 311).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1973:1012DEC000517871

Admin. suprême

12 octobre 1973

12 octobre 1973

Government" for the purpose of Articles 1 and 2 of the Act for Appeal from Administrative Decrees (Wet Beroep Administratieve Beschikkingen), lodged an appeal in conformity with the above Appeals act to the Queen

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:1022REP001858091

Admin. suprême

22 octobre 1993

22 octobre 1993

Requête N° 18580/91                                Thomas Quinn

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:0507DEC001204586

Admin. suprême

7 mai 1987

7 mai 1987

  The Queen <1952> A.C. 480, 486:           'The rule against admission of hearsay evidence is         fundamental.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1209JUD001591108

Admin. suprême

9 décembre 2014

9 décembre 2014

    The list of exceptions to the right to liberty secured in Article 5 § 1 is an exhaustive one (see Quinn v. France , 22 March 1995, § 42, Series A no. 311, and Labita v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0206DEC002138705

Admin. suprême

6 février 2007

6 février 2007

The applicants state that three other internal inquiries (referred to as the Hind, Clark and Quinn inquiries) had been conducted.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0325DEC004430113

Admin. suprême

25 mars 2014

25 mars 2014

Liverpool   Claire HARRISON 07/12/1980 Liverpool     EAD Solicitors LLP   44379/13 12/06/2013 Gordon BARON 10/08/1951 Preston   Winifred BARON 10/10/1958 Preston   Margaret QUINN

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1833863-1932564

Admin. suprême

9 novembre 2006

9 novembre 2006

  In one of its issues in 1997 the applicant company published a one-page article about the alleged harassment of two beauty queens, one of whom alleged that she had been raped.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1218JUD003066304

Admin. suprême

18 décembre 2008

18 décembre 2008

After her husband had been murdered, Mr   N.L. had advised her to be quiet about the matter; - Mrs A.L.’s (the applicant’s mother’s) testimony that on 12 November 1995 her son had bought gloves, tennis

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0115DEC004819899

Admin. suprême

15 janvier 2004

15 janvier 2004

female harp seal which was protecting her pup”; “Seals skinned alive”; the applicant was “being beaten up by furious hunters, who also threatened to hit him on the head with a gaff if he did not keep quiet

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0120DEC003956198

Admin. suprême

20 janvier 2004

20 janvier 2004

There is no explicit right in the Convention to a clean and quiet environment, but where an individual is directly and seriously affected by noise or other pollution, an issue may arise under Article 8

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1206JUD002508807

Admin. suprême

6 décembre 2012

6 décembre 2012

In the light of this, it would have been particularly risky directly to confront the anonymous witness with the defence counsel, given that the counsel was under no legal obligation to keep quiet about

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0402DEC002530710

Admin. suprême

2 avril 2013

2 avril 2013

A second interview would disturb R.’s balance whereas peace and quiet and the building up of trust and stability in the family situation were of more importance for R.’s further general development.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0529DEC005996809

Admin. suprême

29 mai 2012

29 mai 2012

On an unspecified date in October 2003, following an argument, [A.] threatened to   hit the [first applicant] with a grinding machine if she didn’t be quiet.” 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0910JUD004631108

Admin. suprême

10 septembre 2020

10 septembre 2020

The individual has a right to respect for his home, meaning not just the right to the actual physical area, but also to the quiet enjoyment of that area within reasonable limits.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0228JUD001846906

Admin. suprême

28 février 2012

28 février 2012

They noted that the applicant’s supporters had disrupted M.I.’s meeting and subsequently “made for the streets and attempted to disrupt the peace and quiet of the town’s population”. 14.

Source officielle