Judgments in favour of the first applicant 7.

PRODEPIERRE Représentant : Me Jean-françois FAOU, avocat au barreau de PARIS, vestiaire : C1256 C/ Madame [E] [W] [K] Exécutoire, copie, dossier délivrés à : Me FAOU Jean-François Copie

283 [G] [W] épouse [U] représentée par Maître Jérôme NALET de la SELARL LYVEAS AVOCATS, avocats au barreau de VERSAILLES, vestiaire : 283 DEFENDEURS : [K], [F], [R] [H] représenté par Me Frédérique FARGUES

Suzete NASCIMENTO GUERREIRO 1935 Portugaise Faro 21. Paulo Alexandre PIRES DE SÁ 1974 Portugaise Faro 22. Maria Margarida SANCHO CRUZ RAMOS 1952 Portugaise Faro 23.

The complaint about the prolonged non-enforcement of the judgment in the applicant’s favour was communicated to the Government.

The final judgment in the applicant’s favour was adopted on 11   May 2022.

EDIFIER ET QU'AINSI CETTE SOCIETE A PROFITE DU MEME AVANTAGE ; QU'ENFIN, LE 16 MARS 1968, LA SOCIETE LES ROCAILLES A VENDU 800/900EMES INDIVIS DU TERRAIN A LA SOCIETE CIVILE IMMOBILIERE LES MAS DU FARON

Vu les procédures suivantes : I°) Sous le n° 2002075, par une requête et des mémoires complémentaires, enregistrés les 18 mai 2020, 21 octobre 2020, 3 mars 2021 et 2 décembre 2021, la SAS MC Faro, représentée

of the Grand Chamber Article 5 Article 5-1 Deprivation of liberty Seclusion of the applicants in their locked patient rooms in psychiatric hospitals due to their dangerousness: relinquishment in favour

Non-conviction based “preventive confiscation” of the applicants’ assets presumed to be proceeds of unlawful activities despite the acquittal of some of the applicants in criminal proceedings: relinquishment in favour

On 2 April 2012 the Myrgorod Court ruled in favour of the applicant.

of the Grand Chamber Article 5 Article 5-1 Deprivation of liberty Seclusion of the applicants in their locked patient rooms in psychiatric hospitals due to their dangerousness: relinquishment in favour

  The applicants complain that, throughout that period, they became the focus of media attention because Emrah İpek was famous, and that if they had received maintenance the child would have had a

    The applicants had final decisions in their favour against private parties rendered by national courts, on various dates, to be enforced.

On an unspecified date a criminal investigation was instituted against the applicant on account of his having disseminated propaganda in favour of an illegal organization, namely the PKK (Kurdish Workers

On 12   September   2002, the judgment in the applicant’s favour was fully enforced and the applicant was paid 5168.60 UAH.

In May 2011, following their resumption, the first applicant was paid the full amounts awarded in his favour. 2.

    Judgments in the applicant’s favour and the employer company’s insolvency 2.

TRIBUNAL DE COMMERCE DE LILLE-MÉTROPOLE JUGEMENT DU 21/10/2025 Composition du Tribunal : Monsieur Hugues de LABROUHE de LABORDERIE, Président d'audience, Monsieur Michel FAROUX Président d'audience,

  1 on account of the quashing of a final and binding judgment in his mother’s favour (see, for example, Ressegatti v.