application of the so-called general police clause enshrined in the Federal Constitution, which could be invoked by the authorities to deal with “emergency situations” in the absence of other legal means

  In the present case the Supreme Court had validated the agreement in question by means of a final ruling, after hearing evidence from the parties and on the basis of established case-law, making

requirements of Article   5   §   3, namely the growing and legitimate concern both in Europe and internationally in relation to environmental offences and the tendency to use criminal law as a means

Moreover, ordering disclosure to prevent further leaks would only be justified in exceptional circumstances where no reasonable and less invasive alternative means were available to discover the source

Accordingly, the only means by which the applicant had been able to exercise his parental rights had been by virtue of interim measures granting him a right of contact during his occasional visits to the

In addition, she had been left without any means of obtaining a review of her case as a result of the absolute nature of the time-limit for appealing against a judicial sale provided for in domestic legislation

    By means of a letter of the same date, the applicant submitted her application “to be registered in the Prospective Port Workers Register” to take up the post of port worker which had been

It was the liability of the latter to ensure the transmission of the appeal, by means of postal services, to the relevant court (see paragraph 14 below).

Moreover, Article 10 applies not only to the content of the information but also to the means of transmission or reception since any restriction imposed on the means necessarily interferes with the right

devant Madame Elsa LAVERGNE, Conseiller désignée par ordonnance de Madame la Première Présidente, qui s'est chargée du rapport, les parties ne s'y étant pas opposées, avec l'assistance de Madame Sophie MESSA

devant Monsieur Cyril GUYAT, Conseiller désigné par ordonnance de Madame la Première Présidente, qui s'est chargé du rapport, les parties ne s'y étant pas opposées, avec l'assistance de Madame Sophie MESSA

devant Monsieur Cyril GUYAT, Conseiller désigné par ordonnance de Madame la Première Présidente, qui s'est chargé du rapport, les parties ne s'y étant pas opposées, avec l'assistance de Madame Sophie MESSA

devant Madame Elsa LAVERGNE, Conseiller désigné par ordonnance de Madame la Première Présidente, qui s'est chargée du rapport, les parties ne s'y étant pas opposées, avec l'assistance de Madame Sophie MESSA

Cour : Jugement du Conseil de Prud'hommes - Formation paritaire de CHAMBERY en date du 17 Décembre 2021, RG 20/00116 APPELANT : Monsieur [M] [S] [Adresse 1] [Localité 3] Représentant : Me Frédéric

avocat plaidant au barreau de MARSEILLE COMPOSITION DE LA COUR : Lors de l'audience publique des débats, tenue en double rapporteur, sans opposition des avocats, le 07 avril 2022 par Monsieur Frédéric

débats, et lors du délibéré : Monsieur Frédéric PARIS, Président, Monsieur Cyril GUYAT, Conseiller, Madame Isabelle CHUILON, Conseiller, ******** Faits et procédure M.

SAVOIE LABO poursuites et diligences de son représentant légal en exercice domicilié en cette qualité audit siège [Adresse 2] [Adresse 5] [Localité 3] Représentée par Me Frédéric RENAUD de la SELARL

  Article 32 S UPPLEMENTARY MEANS OF INTERPRETATION Recourse may be had to supplementary means of interpretation, including the preparatory work of the treaty and the circumstances of its conclusion

In addition, national legislation did not provide any alternative means of redress, as the time ‑ limit could not be restored by seeking extraordinary remedies.