As in the previous cases (see, for example, Kirilova and Others , §   104, and Antonovi , § 28, both cited above), the Court is of the view that the decisions of 15 October 1981 and

  On 10/12/2016 complaint to the Kirov Police Department/the complaint transferred to the Leninskiy Investigative Department in Kirov/ Refusal to open a criminal case of 20/01/2017, overruled by the

width:216.44pt; display:inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .sC1AC44A4 { width:228.11pt; display:inline-block } FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 35666/03 by Marina Kimovna

of its list of cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The application was lodged by Mr Mikhail Viktorovich Chibisov, a Russian national who was born in 1966 and lives in the town of Kirov

  Oktyabrskiy District Court of Kirov on 4 October 2004 (conviction of murder)   Kirov Regional Court on 16 November 2004 (upheld the conviction on appeal) Anonymous prosecution witness “Petrov

2022   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of allocation to a remote colony     41382/20 28/08/2020 Vladimir Alekseyevich BUDNIKOV 1946     IK-5 Kirov

Mrs Kirilova died on 2 January 2001.

    The case is of the type examined in Kirilova and Others v. Bulgaria (nos. 42908/98 and 3 others, 9 June 2005), and the follow-up cases.

  5,300     78118/16 21/11/2016 Vladimir Valeryevich Vasilyev 08/08/1978 IK-29 Kirov Region 26/11/2015 to 09/11/2016 11 month(s) and 15 day(s) 6 inmate(s) 2.5 m² Lack of fresh air, lack

for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [1]     78378/13 30/09/2013 Aleksey Sergeyevich Shestakov 11/12/1976 Ponaryev Vladimir Aleksandrovich Kirov

There being no indication that the five-year limitation periods in respect of them have been interrupted, they must have expired in, respectively, May and July 2021 (compare Kirov and Others , cited above

La Cour en conclut que les requérants n’entendent plus maintenir leur requête au sens de l’article 37 § 1 a) de la Convention (voir Borislavova Charaptchieva et Kirova Gueorguieva c.

, Leninskiy District Court of Kirov 15/12/2021   7,500   12703/22 12/01/2022 Vladimir Mikhaylovich BUMBU 1989     Onega Town Court of the Arkhangelsk Region 21/12/2021   7,500

insects/rodents, no or restricted access to toilet, no or restricted access to shower, poor quality of food   12,500   43477/19 05/08/2019 Roman Sergeyevich KROTOV 1978     IK-5 Kirov

inline-block } .sF52EF7EE { width:229.11pt; display:inline-block }   CINQUIÈME SECTION DÉCISION SUR LA RECEVABILITÉ de la requête n o 58694/00 présentée par Petar Alexandrov et Gospodinka Alexandrova KIROVI

or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, inadequate clothing     29395/18 08/06/2018 Roman Aleksandrovich SUDZHENKOV 21/12/1986 Toreyeva Svetlana Anatolyevna Moscow IK-29 OIK-5 the Kirov

    On the merits, the Court starts by noting that the case is similar to the ones examined by it in Kirilova and Others (cited above) and a number of follow-up cases (see, for example, Lazarov

  47891/21 07/09/2021 Sergey Nikolayevich DYADKIN 1969 Inna Viktorovna Kosheleva Kirov Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy   Kirov 23/01/2021   Rally in support of Mr A.

Rally in support of Mr   Navalnyy   Kirov   23/01/2021   Rally in support of Mr   Navalnyy   Kirov   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO         &